To Vanadium 50: it is not a question of accepting or not a theory, it is a question of trying to have a "complete" theory, i.e. which answers more questions than it creates new ones. Quark theory answers many high energy accelerator experiments, but what about the universe history? or about the observation of "natural" process, i.e. in astronomy, in cosmology.
Physicists changed the paradigms, in early twenty twenties centuries, physicists developed theories to explain "natural" events, i.e. photoelectric effect, absorption and emission rays, Michelson-Morley experiments, stable atoms although it was in contradiction with bremsstrahlung radiation predicted by Maxwell's equations, Electron scattering, etc...
Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, QED, was developed and explained these observations.
Afterwards, physics, in an attempt to unify all interactions, develops theory to explain what is observed at "ultra" high energy experiments, i.e. in accelerator, at energy so high that it does not naturally append any more in the universe, even in astronomy.
To vanhees71: I do not understand why we could not observe "colored particles", let's imagine that there was a small excess of "rod" quarks in the baryogenesis epoch, then after quark decay it should survive only "red" free up quarks that can catch electrons to make "upelectronium" atom, i.e. a hydrogen-like atom in which a electron is bind to a "red" up quark.
Are we able to check in stellar absorption rays that there are no faint rays with energies about -(2/3)**2 13.6 eV/n**2 ? (about, not equal, because the up quark mass is not so high than the proton one)
Indeed, if there was a "red" color excess in the initial epoch, it is not possible for the excess "red" quarks to form baryons with other "green" and "blue" quarks, and thus they should remains free, i.e. no making "composite" particles, and thus should catch electrons in the nucleosynthesis epoch.
PS: I forgot to thank you for replying to me