Undergrad Quasi-Static Change of Event Horizon Area

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the formula for the rate of change of the event horizon area, specifically ##\frac{dA}{dv} = \frac{8\pi}{\kappa} \oint_{\mathscr{H}} (\frac{1}{8\pi} \sigma^2 + T_{ab} \xi^a \xi^b) dS##. The Raychaudhuri equation is utilized to relate the expansion rate, shear, and energy-momentum tensor on the horizon. There is uncertainty about justifying the quasi-static approximation that simplifies the equation by eliminating certain terms. Participants note that the question may not be suitable for all audiences, as it assumes familiarity with advanced concepts like surface gravity and shear. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the need for clarity and context in complex theoretical physics problems.
ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
1,387
Let ##\mathscr{H}## be a constant-##v## cross-section of the event horizon (area ##A##). The expansion is the fractional rate of change of the surface element, ##\theta = \frac{1}{\delta S} \frac{d(\delta S)}{dv}##. The problem asks to prove the formula ##\frac{dA}{dv} = \frac{8\pi}{\kappa} \oint_{\mathscr{H}} (\frac{1}{8\pi} \sigma^2 + T_{ab} \xi^a \xi^b) dS## where ##\xi## is the tangent to the null generators.

I used the Raychaudhuri equation to write down\begin{align*}
\oint_{\mathscr{H}} \left( \frac{1}{8\pi} \sigma^2 + T_{ab} \xi^a \xi^b \right) dS &= \frac{1}{8\pi} \oint_{\mathscr{H}} \left(\kappa \theta - \frac{1}{2} \theta^2 - \frac{d\theta}{dv} \right) dS \\ \\
&= \underbrace{\frac{\kappa}{8\pi} \frac{d}{dv} \oint_{\mathscr{H}} dS}_{= \frac{\kappa}{8\pi} \frac{dA}{dv} } - \frac{1}{8\pi} \oint_{\mathscr{H}} \left( \frac{1}{2} \theta^2 + \frac{d\theta}{dv} \right) dS
\end{align*}I suppose the quasi-static approximation is supposed to kill the other term but I'd like to justify it properly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As I suggested in another one of your questions, you should really provide a reference.
Your homework question is
not self-contained.

For the possibly interested reader, what is \kappa, \sigma,…,etc?

If the question was only intended for those already familiar with the situation, then this should be classified as A-level, not I-level.
 
  • Like
Likes ergospherical
Sorry, the question is the last one in the Black Hole section of E. Poisson's relativist's toolkit. ##\kappa## is the surface gravity, ##\sigma^2 = \sigma^{ab}\sigma_{ab}## the square of the shear, ##v## the parameter along the null generators and ##dS = \sqrt{^2g} d^2 \theta## the surface element on ##\mathscr{H}## with ##(^2g)_{ab} = \frac{\partial x^{c}}{\partial \theta^a} \frac{\partial x^d}{\partial \theta^b} g_{cd}## the pull-back of ##g## onto ##\mathscr{H}##.
 
In an inertial frame of reference (IFR), there are two fixed points, A and B, which share an entangled state $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0>_A|1>_B+|1>_A|0>_B) $$ At point A, a measurement is made. The state then collapses to $$ |a>_A|b>_B, \{a,b\}=\{0,1\} $$ We assume that A has the state ##|a>_A## and B has ##|b>_B## simultaneously, i.e., when their synchronized clocks both read time T However, in other inertial frames, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the moment when B has ##|b>_B##...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
924
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K