I Query on use of prism in delayed choice quantum eraser experiment

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the use of a prism in the Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser experiment, specifically questioning its depiction in schematic diagrams. Participants express skepticism about the accuracy of the prism's representation, noting that it appears to violate Snell's law. While some believe the diagram's inaccuracies are minor, others argue they are significant and misleading. Additionally, mistakes in the ray paths through the Glan-Thomson prism are mentioned. Overall, the conversation highlights concerns about the fidelity of visual representations in quantum mechanics experiments.
Steve4Physics
Homework Helper
Gold Member
2024 Award
Messages
2,786
Reaction score
2,505
TL;DR
Query on use of prism in delayed choice quantum eraser experiment
Hi. I’ve seen a number of schematic diagrams for the Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser experiment. Some include a prism to make the two idler photon paths diverge.

However, the prism is shown refracting the ‘idler rays’ in a way which contravenes Snell’s law. E.g. see prism marked ‘PS’ (not the Glan-Thompson prism) here:
Eraser.png


(from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delayed-choice_quantum_eraser)

Is this a mistake or have I misunderstood something? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Steve4Physics said:
However, the prism is shown refracting the ‘idler rays’ in a way which contravenes Snell’s law. E.g. see prism marked ‘PS’ (not the Glan-Thompson prism) here:
Hmmm. I doubt the prism in the diagram is supposed to show the actual path of light in the experiment.
 
  • Like
Likes Steve4Physics
Drakkith said:
Hmmm. I doubt the prism in the diagram is supposed to show the actual path of light in the experiment.
Yes. It seems that part of the diagram is a bit of a 'bodge'. But the rest of the diagram seems OK. But I've found similar diagrams showing the same thing, so it's very puzzling.
 
No one is worried about Snell's law when they're throwing shapes and lines into powerpoint. :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes tistemfnp, vanhees71, Steve4Physics and 1 other person
Drakkith said:
No one is worried about Snell's law when they're throwing shapes and lines into powerpoint. :wink:
I guess so. But it's much more than a minor misjudgement of angles.

And I noticed another mistake in the diagram. The ray paths through the Glan-Thomson prism (just after the SPDC non-linear crystal) are wrong.

Maybe I'm just being too picky!

With a bit of searching (using Google Images) I've now found a diagram which appears correct. I’m not sure about copyright so here's just the link:
https://www.researchgate.net/public...-delayed-choice-quantum-eraser-experiment.ppm
 
  • Like
Likes Drakkith and vanhees71
For the quantum state ##|l,m\rangle= |2,0\rangle## the z-component of angular momentum is zero and ##|L^2|=6 \hbar^2##. According to uncertainty it is impossible to determine the values of ##L_x, L_y, L_z## simultaneously. However, we know that ##L_x## and ## L_y##, like ##L_z##, get the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. In other words, for the state ##|2,0\rangle## we have ##\vec{L}=(L_x, L_y,0)## with ##L_x## and ## L_y## one of the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. But none of these...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
4K