I Query on use of prism in delayed choice quantum eraser experiment

Steve4Physics
Homework Helper
Gold Member
2024 Award
Messages
2,745
Reaction score
2,479
TL;DR Summary
Query on use of prism in delayed choice quantum eraser experiment
Hi. I’ve seen a number of schematic diagrams for the Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser experiment. Some include a prism to make the two idler photon paths diverge.

However, the prism is shown refracting the ‘idler rays’ in a way which contravenes Snell’s law. E.g. see prism marked ‘PS’ (not the Glan-Thompson prism) here:
Eraser.png


(from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delayed-choice_quantum_eraser)

Is this a mistake or have I misunderstood something? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Steve4Physics said:
However, the prism is shown refracting the ‘idler rays’ in a way which contravenes Snell’s law. E.g. see prism marked ‘PS’ (not the Glan-Thompson prism) here:
Hmmm. I doubt the prism in the diagram is supposed to show the actual path of light in the experiment.
 
  • Like
Likes Steve4Physics
Drakkith said:
Hmmm. I doubt the prism in the diagram is supposed to show the actual path of light in the experiment.
Yes. It seems that part of the diagram is a bit of a 'bodge'. But the rest of the diagram seems OK. But I've found similar diagrams showing the same thing, so it's very puzzling.
 
No one is worried about Snell's law when they're throwing shapes and lines into powerpoint. :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes tistemfnp, vanhees71, Steve4Physics and 1 other person
Drakkith said:
No one is worried about Snell's law when they're throwing shapes and lines into powerpoint. :wink:
I guess so. But it's much more than a minor misjudgement of angles.

And I noticed another mistake in the diagram. The ray paths through the Glan-Thomson prism (just after the SPDC non-linear crystal) are wrong.

Maybe I'm just being too picky!

With a bit of searching (using Google Images) I've now found a diagram which appears correct. I’m not sure about copyright so here's just the link:
https://www.researchgate.net/public...-delayed-choice-quantum-eraser-experiment.ppm
 
  • Like
Likes Drakkith and vanhees71
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I am not sure if this falls under classical physics or quantum physics or somewhere else (so feel free to put it in the right section), but is there any micro state of the universe one can think of which if evolved under the current laws of nature, inevitably results in outcomes such as a table levitating? That example is just a random one I decided to choose but I'm really asking about any event that would seem like a "miracle" to the ordinary person (i.e. any event that doesn't seem to...
Back
Top