Question abou Patterson Algorithm

  • Thread starter Thread starter juaninf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algorithm
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a proposition in the preliminaries section of the Patterson Algorithm that states "\theta/p | \psi/p" leading to "\theta | \psi". The user seeks clarification on the implications of this statement and the role of the variable g, questioning why it does not have a degree and why a smaller choice for g might contradict the conditions outlined. There is also a reminder about forum etiquette regarding thread bumping. The conversation highlights the need for a deeper understanding of the mathematical relationships and choices involved in the algorithm. Overall, the thread emphasizes the complexities of the Patterson Algorithm and the importance of precise definitions in mathematical propositions.
juaninf
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Hi every one

In the preliminaries section, the item c), there a proposition that say: "So by our choice of g we get "\theta/p | \psi/p" whence "\theta | \psi" ". I am not understanding this propositión, Please help me

...
 

Attachments

Mathematics news on Phys.org
That

\theta/p~\vert~\psi/p

means that there exists a c such that

c\theta/p=\psi/p

Now multiply both sides by p...
 
thanks by your attention, but, a important part is: In the preliminaries section, the item c), there a proposition that say: "So by our choice of g we get "
\theta/p | \psi/p[\tex], how i use "So by our choice of g we get", Why g havenot any degree?, why choice small as posible that contravening c)?
 
Last edited:
juaninf, if you keep "bumping" your threads every few minutes, you are going to get banned.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top