Question about Ampere's law in vacuum and in matter

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the derivation of Ampere's law in both vacuum and matter, specifically the equation \(\nabla \times H = J_f + \partial D/\partial t\) from \(\nabla \times B = \mu_0 J + \epsilon_0 \mu_0 \partial E/\partial t\). The participants highlight that while Maxwell's equations in vacuum can be used to study electromagnetic fields in matter, additional assumptions about material properties, such as the proportionality of \(D\) to \(E\), are necessary. The introduction of polarization current density \(J_p\) is identified as crucial for resolving discrepancies in the derivation when materials exhibit non-linear or tensor properties.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Maxwell's equations in vacuum
  • Familiarity with electromagnetic field concepts such as \(D\), \(E\), and \(H\)
  • Knowledge of material properties, specifically polarization and bound charges
  • Basic grasp of vector calculus, particularly curl and divergence operations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of polarization current density \(J_p\) in electromagnetic theory
  • Explore the behavior of non-linear materials in electromagnetic fields
  • Learn about the role of tensor permittivity \(\epsilon_r\) in Maxwell's equations
  • Investigate the derivation of Maxwell's equations in various media
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, electrical engineers, and students studying electromagnetism, particularly those interested in the application of Maxwell's equations in different materials and the complexities introduced by polarization effects.

Arham
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Hi

We can derive equation \nabla.D=\rho_f from equation \nabla.E=\rho/\epsilon_0. But what about Ampere's law? I tried to derive \nabla\times{H}=J_f+\partial{D}/\partial{t} from \nabla\times{B}=\mu_0J+\epsilon_0\mu_0\partial{E}/\partial{t} but I could not. This is strange because I thought that Maxwell's equations in vacuum are enough for studying electromagnetic field in any matter and that Maxwell's equations in matter are derivable from them.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
They are, if you add some assumptions about the material - D proportional (and parallel) to E and so on.
For materials where this is not true, I don't know.
 
\partial{D}/\partial{t}=\epsilon_0\partial{E}/\partial{t}+\partial{P}/\partial{t}. The second term is underivable from Ampere's law in vacuum.
 
Add the assumption that ##D \propto E##, and it works.

In general, this can be wrong, but I don't know if the regular Maxwell equations work there at all. If ##\epsilon_r## is a tensor (or nonlinear), things can get difficult.
 
Dear mfb,

I think I found the solution. \partial{P}/\partial{t} is some kind of current (bound charges are moving). So if we write total current density as J=J_f+\nabla\times{M}+J_p where J_p is polarization current density, we can solve the problem.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
719
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
637
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K