Question about canonical transformations

  • Thread starter Thread starter javiergra24
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Transformations
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 2K views
javiergra24
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody

I've got a problem related to canonical transformations that I can`t solve:

Given the expression of the canonical transformation

[tex] Q=3q\cdot\big[ \exp\big((p+q)^5\big)+1\big] +3p\cdot \big[\exp((p+q)^5)+1\big]+p[/tex]
[tex] P=p+q[/tex]
I have to calculate an associated canonical transformation. Anybody can help me?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure you have stated exactly your problem?
 
Exact problems is (from exam):
Given the transformation

[tex] Q=3q\cdot\big[ \exp\big((p+q)^5\big)+1\big] +p\cdot \big[2\exp((p+q)^5)-1\big] [/tex]

[tex] P=q+p[/tex]

Modify it slightly in order to be canonical

Answer. After imposing the condition for the Poisson bracket (equal to one) we get the result:
[tex] \boxed{Q=3q\cdot\big[ \exp\big((p+q)^5\big)+1\big] +3p\cdot \big[\exp((p+q)^5)+1\big]+p}[/tex]

In part two we're asked to obtain an associated canonical transformation. But after reading my books and papers about mechanics I still don't know what's an "associated trasformation mean". Is it the inverse transformation?
 
Last edited:
OK. Now part of the problem is clear - supposing it is indeed a canonical transformation (I didn't check). But what the author of this exercise means by an "associated canonical transformation" - that I don't know.
 
arkajad said:
OK. Now part of the problem is clear - supposing it is indeed a canonical transformation (I didn't check). But what the author of this exercise means by an "associated canonical transformation" - that I don't know.

Same here. I suppose the questioner might just be looking for an equivalent transformation, but written in a different functional form... something like

[tex]Q=Q(q,P)=3P\left(e^{P^5}+1\right) +P-q[/tex] and [tex]P=q+p[/tex]
instead of
[tex]Q=Q(q,p)=3q\left(e^{(p+q)^5}+1\right)+3p\left(e^{(p+q)^5}+1\right)+p[/tex] and [tex]P=q+p[/tex]

...but that's just a guess