Question about cards (challenging problem)

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter njama
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cards
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the probability of opponents holding a higher pair than a pair of Kings (KK) in a poker scenario. The initial calculation provided by the user yields a probability of approximately 0.0098 for facing a larger pair when playing against two opponents. The user explores a more efficient approximation method using the formula P(A_1 ∪ A_2) = P(A_1) + P(A_2) - P(A_1 ∩ A_2), ultimately seeking to determine P(A_1 ∩ A_2), the probability that both opponents hold the same higher pair (AA). The error in the user's calculations is attributed to a misunderstanding of the probabilities involved, particularly in calculating P(A_1 ∩ A_2).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic probability concepts
  • Familiarity with combinatorial mathematics, specifically binomial coefficients
  • Knowledge of poker rules, particularly Texas Hold'em
  • Experience with probability calculations involving multiple events
NEXT STEPS
  • Study combinatorial probability in poker scenarios
  • Learn about conditional probability and its applications in card games
  • Explore advanced probability techniques, such as Bayesian inference
  • Research common pitfalls in probability calculations in gaming contexts
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, poker enthusiasts, game theorists, and anyone interested in probability calculations related to card games.

njama
Messages
215
Reaction score
1
Hello!

I have been doing a research about probability of facing a larger pair when holding let's say a KK. So the possible pairs larger than KK are AA (total 2_C_4=6).

Now if I play with 2 opponents the probability of getting larger pair is:

[tex]\frac{6*{48 \choose 2}}{{50 \choose 2}{48 \choose 2} \div 2!}}=[/tex]

[tex]=0,0097959183673469387755102040816327[/tex]

But now there is similar approach which is much efficient and good approximation:

Here is the idea:

You suppose that you play individually by two of the players.

[tex]P(A_1 \cup A_2)= P(A_1) + P(A_2) - P(A_1 \cap A_2)[/tex]

where [tex]P(A_1)[/tex] is the probability of getting larger pair of the first opponent and [tex]P(A_2)[/tex] of the second opponent.

Now because [tex]P(A_1 \cap A_2)[/tex] is very small you can just compute [tex]P(A_1) + P(A_2)[/tex] and you will get:

[tex]0.009795918367346938775510204081633[/tex] which is a almost perfect approx.

But now the problem is that I want to subtract [tex]P(A_1 \cap A_2)[/tex] so that I can get the correct answer.

Now because [tex]P(A_1)=P(A_2)=\frac{6}{{50 \choose 2}}=0.0048979591836734693877551020408163[/tex]

[tex]2*P(A_1)=0.009795918367346938775510204081633[/tex]

Now the error is about [tex]10^{-34}[/tex], so [tex]P(A_1 \cap A_2) \approx 10^{-34}[/tex]

Now I only need to find [tex]P(A_1 \cap A_2)[/tex], that is "what is the probability that same pair of AA will come two the opponents"?

For ex. what is the probability that A(spades) A (diamond) will come to both opponents?

Here is my reasoning:

[tex]P(A_1 \cap A_2) \approx (\frac{4}{50} * \frac{3}{49})^2 \approx 0,00002399[/tex]

or the correct one [tex]\frac{(120}{(50*49)^2}=0,00001999[/tex]

which is not even close to [tex]10^{-34}[/tex].

Where is my error?

Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
bump!

Anybody, what I am doing wrong?
 
Hi, njama

Your first solution,

[tex]\frac{6*{48 \choose 2}}{{50 \choose 2}{48 \choose 2} \div 2!}}=[/tex]

is exactly twice the probability P(A_1):

[tex]P(A_1)=P(A_2)=\frac{6}{{50 \choose 2}}[/tex]

So I don't think your first solution gives the probability you are looking for, that at least one opponent has a higher pair. The very small difference of 10^-34 between your first answer and P(A_1) + P(A_2) is probably due to rounding error. That could happen when you multiply by and then divide by 48 choose 2. Your second approach, using P(A_1 or A_2) = P(A_1) + P(A_2) - P(A_1 and A_2) is the right way to go about it. I don't understand how you are calculating P(A_1 and A_2), though.

Is this question about hold'em poker, where each player gets two cards and there is a round of betting before the "flop" (first three community cards) are dealt?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
931