Question about cross and dot product

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the equations \(\nu \cdot E = 0\) and \(\nu \times E = -\frac{dB}{dt}\) in the context of electromagnetic theory. The participant attempts to differentiate the electric field \(E\) represented as \(E(s, \phi, z, t) = A \cos(Kz - \omega t)\) and struggles with the application of the divergence and curl operators. Key points include the use of the product rule in differentiation and the boundary conditions where \(E_{\parallel} = 0\) and \(B_{\perpendicular} = 0\) must be satisfied.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus, specifically divergence and curl operations.
  • Familiarity with Maxwell's equations in electromagnetism.
  • Knowledge of wave functions and their representation in physics.
  • Basic proficiency in LaTeX for mathematical notation.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the product rule in vector calculus.
  • Research Maxwell's equations and their implications in electromagnetic fields.
  • Learn about boundary conditions in electromagnetic theory.
  • Explore the representation of wave functions in physics, particularly in relation to electric fields.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying electromagnetism, as well as educators and anyone involved in solving problems related to vector calculus and Maxwell's equations.

leonne
Messages
163
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Note: \nu is del could not find it...

I need to prove the \nu*E=0
and \nu x E=-dB/dt

Homework Equations


E(s\phizt)=(Acos(Kz=wt)/s)s^

The Attempt at a Solution


so for the first one \nu*E=0 I thought it would be
d/ds(E) but what they did was 1/s d/ds(s E) no idea why they did it. Is it because its S^? I thought i remember doing something like this.
for the cross product
d/ds d/d\phi d/dz
E 0 0

...I got the right answer but they got 0+dE/dZ \phi^-1/s dE/d\phi z^
no idea how they got the z^ i thought it was 0, well it does =0 but where did the -1/s come from?
thanks for the help[STRIKE][STRIKE][/STRIKE][/STRIKE]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
try writing all youyr code in a single tex banner & to write del (\nabla), so you want to show:
\nabla \bullet E = 0

how about directly applying the product? I can;t really understand the form of your electric field - mayeb you can re-write it?
 
hmm can't edit my post
so need to show that
\nabla \bullet E=0
\nabla \times E= -dB/dT
Well its a wave function
And i need to show that E satisfy Maxwell equation and the boundary conditions.
boundary condition E parallel =0 and B perpendicular=0
lets say E was x^ for the dot product
(d/dx+d/dy+d/dz)(E x^+0+0) so i would have dE/dx am i wrong?
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K