Question about derivatives and differentials

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between derivatives and differentials, specifically questioning why dy/dx, although not a true ratio, can be treated as one in certain contexts. It explains that while dy/dx represents the derivative of y with respect to x, the expression dy = f'(x)dx shows how differentials can be manipulated similarly to fractions. The notation implies a multiplication of both sides by dx, which raises questions about mathematical correctness. It emphasizes that while dy and dx are not defined separately, they often behave like fractions in practical applications, especially in introductory calculus. Caution is advised when applying this concept in more advanced topics like partial derivatives, where the behavior may differ.
Miike012
Messages
1,009
Reaction score
0
I have an easy question which I've been thinking about for a while..

Lets say I want to take the derivative of a function y = f(x) with respect to x, we would get.

dy/dx = f'(x).

In the couple of books I've skimmed through, they all say that dy/dx is not a ratio but the notation that implied taking the derivative of y with respect to x.

Question:
If dy/dx is not a ratio then how come the differential of y is equal to f'(x)dx? It almost seems as they are multiplying both sides by dx. This can't be mathematically correct, can it? I would like to know mathematically how dy is equal to f'(x)dx.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Less formally, yes, the derivative, dy/dx, is NOT a fraction but it is the limit of a fraction and as a result can often be treated as a fraction (go back before the limit, use the fraction property, and then take the limit again). In order to make that explicit, we define differentials by "dy = f'(x)dx. Strictly speaking, neither "dy" nor "dx" is defined separately- they must appear together.

(In differential geometry where we have vector functions or function values of other kinds of things than numbers "differentials" are given a slightly different (but equivalent) and more precise definition.)
 
For practical purposes, you can almost always treat dy/dx as a ratio.
When you learn the chain rule, it says "dy/dx = (dy/du)(du/dx)" -- and you'll say, well, of course. Later on, when you come to partial derivatives, you have the seemingly strange result that the product of two partials that look like you could just "cancel" one differential will turn negative. So be a bit wary. But in the first calculus class, when you'll be doing "related rate" problems, you can confidently write things like,
dh/dt = (dV/dt)/(dV/dh), as if derivatives were ordinary fractions.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K