Undergrad Question about divergence theorem and delta dirac function

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving the validity of the divergence theorem for any closed surface containing the origin, specifically that the line integral equals 4π. It is noted that by removing a small spherical cavity at the origin, the total surface integral remains zero, while the integral over the cavity yields -4π. The conversation also touches on the substitution of vectors in deriving equations, explaining that the transformation from r to r - r' is permissible through the chain rule. Participants suggest that using spherical coordinates simplifies the proof without loss of generality. The overall focus is on applying mathematical principles to validate the theorem.
Clara Chung
Messages
300
Reaction score
13
upload_2019-2-13_19-59-47.png

How do you prove 1.85 is valid for all closed surface containing the origin? (i.e. the line integral = 4pi for any closed surface including the origin)
 

Attachments

  • upload_2019-2-13_19-59-47.png
    upload_2019-2-13_19-59-47.png
    30.7 KB · Views: 4,890
Physics news on Phys.org
I would say by inspection, if you note that for a non-spherical surface the R would in fact be a function: ##R(r,\theta,\phi)## and that ##R(r,\theta,\phi)## factors cancel out using the rules of algebra, leaving an integral of angles only.

Since the ##R(r,\theta,\phi)## factors cancel, then you can choose R to be a spherical surface with no loss in generality.

Perhaps, @Mark44 or @fresh_42 have a more rigorous set of steps.
 
  • Like
Likes Clara Chung
Clara Chung said:
View attachment 238665
How do you prove 1.85 is valid for all closed surface containing the origin? (i.e. the line integral = 4pi for any closed surface including the origin)

You can use the divergence theorem. Take any volume that includes the origin. To avoid the problem at the origin you could remove a small spherical cavity at the origin. The total surface integral is zero and the surface integral of the small cavity is ##-4\pi##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Cryo, Clara Chung and jedishrfu
PeroK said:
You can use the divergence theorem. Take any volume that does not include the origin. To avoid the problem at the origin you could remove a small spherical cavity at the origin. The total surface integral is zero and the surface integral of the small cavity is ##-4\pi##.
upload_2019-2-14_0-47-2.png

How to get 1.100 from 1.99? I can't find the derivation in the book...
 

Attachments

  • upload_2019-2-14_0-47-2.png
    upload_2019-2-14_0-47-2.png
    25.3 KB · Views: 1,668
Clara Chung said:
View attachment 238678
How to get 1.100 from 1.99? I can't find the derivation in the book...

That's just a substitution ##\vec{r}## to ##\vec{r} - \vec{r'}##.
 
  • Like
Likes Clara Chung
PeroK said:
That's just a substitution ##\vec{r}## to ##\vec{r} - \vec{r'}##.
How do you do the substitution? Why is it ok to let ##\vec{r}## = ##\vec{r} - \vec{r'}## ? They are not equal..
 
Clara Chung said:
How do you do the substitution? Why is it ok to let ##\vec{r}## = ##\vec{r} - \vec{r'}## ? They are not equal..

In general, if ##f'(x) = g(x)##, then ##f'(x-a) = g(x-a)##. It's a simple application of the chain rule.
 
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K