Question about earth's magnetic field strength

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Earth's magnetic field strength does indeed increase with depth, as established by the inverse cube law and the inverse square law. Measurements underground are limited, but theoretical calculations suggest that the field strength is influenced significantly by proximity to the Earth's core and distance from the equator. When near the core, the influence of one magnetic pole becomes dominant, leading to a decrease in field strength that follows the inverse square law. Accurate predictions require a combination of both laws to account for varying distances from the core and equator.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of magnetic field theories
  • Familiarity with the inverse square law
  • Knowledge of the inverse cube law
  • Basic concepts of Earth's geology and core structure
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical models for calculating magnetic field strength near the Earth's core
  • Study the implications of the inverse square and inverse cube laws in geophysics
  • Explore existing underground magnetic field measurements and their methodologies
  • Investigate the relationship between magnetic fields and geological formations
USEFUL FOR

Geophysicists, earth scientists, and students studying geomagnetism or related fields will benefit from this discussion.

nuby
Messages
336
Reaction score
0
Does Earth's magnetic field strength increase with depth?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know of any measurements being taken udnerground, but I would haev to say "yes," because we do know that the field strength decreases as one moves away from the Earth (by the universe cube law).
 
Interesting.. how could you calculate the field strength near the Earth's core?
 
Last edited:
The nivese cube law wul cotninue to be aplicable at the equator, but close to Earth and far from the equator the inverse square is the rule.

Maybe I should explain that a bit further;
When you're close to the Earth and far from the equator, only one ole is imortant, and the influence from the other pole is negligable (not zero, but small enough). When you're far from the Earth, the difference in distance between one pole and the other is less significant. When dealing with only one pole, the power drops off by the inverse square of the distance, and when dealing with both, it's the inverse cube. Of course, in reality, the accurate prediction would be one that incorperates both formuli to find a value somewhere in between, depending on how close to the core you are and how far from the equator.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
985
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 198 ·
7
Replies
198
Views
15K