Question about Fourier Transforms

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dingo_d
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fourier
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Fourier transforms, specifically focusing on the integration contours used in complex analysis when recovering the original function from its Fourier transform. Participants explore the implications of choosing different contours based on the behavior of the parameters involved.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a function defined over a specific interval and expresses confusion about choosing integration contours in complex analysis when applying Fourier transforms.
  • Another participant suggests using a contour that satisfies Jordan's lemma to ensure the semicircular part of the integral vanishes.
  • A participant raises a concern about having poles in the complex plane and how the choice of contour affects the integral's value, referencing the Cauchy-Goursat theorem.
  • There is a discussion about the behavior of the parameters T and t, and how this influences the choice of contour for the integrals derived from the Fourier transform.
  • One participant questions the number of poles and clarifies that there is only one pole at the origin, while still considering the implications of the exponential terms in the integrals.
  • Another participant notes that while the exponential terms are imaginary and do not decay, the choice of contour can lead to a vanishing integral under certain conditions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the number of poles and the implications of contour choice, indicating that there is no consensus on the best approach to take in this context.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the dependence on the behavior of parameters T and t, which remains unresolved in terms of how they affect the choice of integration contours.

dingo_d
Messages
199
Reaction score
0
Hi!

I have a question about F. transforms. In my exams (for mathematical methods in physics) I'm usually given a function such as:

[tex]f(t)=\begin{cases} 1,\ t\in(-T,T)\\<br /> 0,\ else\\<br /> \end{cases}[/tex]

Now I can find easily [tex]F(\omega)[/tex], but then I need to find the original function again (to confirm the validity of the found transform). And when I integrate I'm converting it into complex integral. And there are the troubles! I end up with exponential functions, but since t is arbitrary I can choose two contours of integration. And the question is: based on what do I choose those contours? Do I have to make it such that I have decaying exponential? My assistant wasn't quite clear on that and I didn't find it anywhere else...

So if anyone could help me I'd appreciate it! Thanx!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yeah, the contour part (and complex integration part) is clear, but say I have two poles on the negative I am part. Choosing the upper half plane as a place to put my contour I will have [tex]\oint f(z)=0[/tex] as Cauchy-Goursat theorem states, and if I choose the bottom half my integral will be [tex]\oint f(z)=2\pi i\sum Res(f)[/tex]. Those two differ, and I am choosing the contours based on a parameter t.

For my original function it's:

[tex]f(t)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^\infty \underbrace{\sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi}}\frac{\sin(\omega T)}{\omega}e^{-i \omega t}}_{F(\omega)}d\omega[/tex]
After a slight manipulation I have:
[tex]\frac{1}{2\pi i}\int_{-\infty}^\infty\frac{1}{\omega}\left[e^{i\omega (T-t)}-e^{-i\omega(T+t)}\right]d\omega[/tex]

I can split those two into separate integrals. We don't know how T and t are behaving respectably to each other (T<t,T>t ?) so if we put different relations we get different values of integral. But based on what do I choose which contour goes for what?
 
I only see one pole at the origin. Why did you say there're two ?
 
Oh my bed, anywho, I get that I have one pole, but still I have [tex]e^{i\omega(T-t)}[/tex] and [tex]e^{-i\omega(T+t)}[/tex], and based on T and t i have different contour. Is it because I'm dealing with the transform which, by definition must exponentially die out? When dealing with something like damped oscillator, I know that I must get exponentially decaying function, but in my case I have rectangle puls...
 
The exponential is imaginary, so it won't "die out" or decay, but the path integral, on the other hand, can "die out", if you can choose an appropriate contour, that's why you need Jordan's lemma.
 
Oh, I see... Thanx!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
12K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K