Question About Ideal Gas and Average Free Movement of Molecules

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Calstiel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Average Gas
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of the mean free path (λ) and collision cross-section (σ) for ideal gases, specifically using the formula λ = 1/(nσ), where n represents the density of particles. Participants debate the necessity of including additional terms in the formula, such as (4πd)/2, to account for potential collisions. The consensus is that for low-density ideal gases, the primary formula suffices, as σλ is significantly greater than any additional terms. The conversation also touches on the philosophical implications of approximations in physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ideal gas laws and behavior
  • Familiarity with collision theory in physics
  • Knowledge of mathematical concepts such as probability and density
  • Basic grasp of statistical mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the mean free path formula in detail
  • Explore the implications of collision cross-section in gas dynamics
  • Learn about statistical mechanics and its applications to ideal gases
  • Investigate the role of approximations in physical models and their philosophical implications
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, and gas dynamics, as well as anyone interested in the mathematical modeling of physical systems.

  • #61
Charles Link said:
Using ## v^2_{rel} ## the dot product term will vanish, and the computation is straightforward, but I don't think the ##v_{rel} ## case (the correct way to do it) has been computed in these articles properly for any distribution. I don't think anyone has worked the ## v_{rel} ## case with the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution.
I'm just going by the result in Wikipedia. It says you can check the integral, which I admit I haven't done. I don't see that post #49 can compare with the calculation on Wikipedia.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Calstiel and Charles Link
Science news on Phys.org
  • #62
PeroK said:
I'm just going by the result in Wikipedia
Wiki =actually Hyperphysics does the general case, (they reference Maxwell-Boltzmann but work only the general case) and they do that somewhat incorrectly by writing ## \bar{v_{rel}}=( \bar{v^2} +\bar{v^2}_2-2 \bar{\vec{v}_1 \cdot \vec{v}_2})^{1/2} ##. This expression for the averages is only approximate and not exact, but Hyperphysics implies it is exact.

The bars for the average didn't come out properly in my Latex. Please go to the Hyperphysics article to see it more clearly: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Kinetic/menfre.html#c5
 
Last edited:
  • #63
Charles Link said:
This expression for the averages is only approximate and not exact, but Wiki implies it is exact.

I'm currently working on a computer simulation of the topic here, so I'm a bit off the thread, but in general its often important to check the sources in Wiki, maybe someone here is doing that.
 
  • #65
@PeroK That makes me want to go back and check my result of post 49=I did get 4/3 for the ## v_{rel} ## case where all speeds are the same. Thank you=this looks like two very good links that you gave us. :)
 
  • #66
Charles Link said:
@PeroK That makes me want to go back and check my result of post 49=I did get 4/3 for the ## v_{rel} ## case where all speeds are the same. Thank you=this looks like two very good links that you gave us. :)
That may well be correct. All speeds the same is different from a M-B distribution.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link
  • #67
PeroK said:
That may well be correct. All speeds the same is different from a M-B distribution.
I'm almost a little surprised by the two different results, ## \sqrt{2}## and 4/3, especially when Hyperphysics does some incorrect handwaving to get the first result for what they seem to be showing as the case in general, regardless of the distribution. I have looked over my calculations of post 49 though, and I believe that I computed the case of all the same speed correctly. Thanks very much for your inputs. :)
 
Last edited:
  • #68
Charles Link said:
I have looked over my calculations of post 49 though, and I believe that I computed the case of all the same speed correctly.
So you've said repeatedly. But how is your calculation physically relevant? Can you cite any physical situation for which a gas is expected to have a mono-speed distribution (a Dirac delta function)?
 
  • #69
renormalize said:
So you've said repeatedly. But how is your calculation physically relevant? Can you cite any physical situation for which a gas is expected to have a mono-speed distribution (a Dirac delta function)?
This is more of an interest to me simply from a mathematical sense, because Hyperphysics seems to imply in the "link" of post 62 that the ## \sqrt{2} ## is the result for the general case. The simple case of post 49 if my calculations are correct would show that this is not the case.

One reason I chose this case (of all speeds being the same) is that it is simple enough to solve. I still need to study the "links" that @PeroK provided in post 64. The mathematics for the M-B case looks somewhat complex from a first look at it.
 
Last edited:
  • #70
Charles Link said:
This is more of an interest to me simply from a mathematical sense, because Hyperphysics seems to imply in the "link" of post 62 that the ## \sqrt{2} ## is the result for the general case.
The Hyperphysics page is clearly wrong in this respect. In general ##E(X) \ne \sqrt{E(X^2)}##. But, if you do the full calculation for a Gaussian distribution of velocities, then ##E(v_r) = \sqrt 2 E(v)##.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
606
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K