Question about miller indicies.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Craptola
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating Miller indices for a shaded plane in relation to primitive lattice vectors, specifically addressing two figures. The first figure's Miller indices are identified as (1 1 1). For the second figure, the user is advised to redefine axes parallel to the lattice vectors and determine intercepts accordingly. The correct approach involves finding intercepts in terms of base vectors, ensuring that Miller indices remain integers, as fractional or non-integer values are not valid.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Miller indices and their calculation
  • Familiarity with lattice vectors and their properties
  • Knowledge of crystallography concepts
  • Ability to work with coordinate systems and transformations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the calculation of Miller indices in non-standard coordinate systems
  • Learn about lattice vectors and their role in crystallography
  • Explore the concept of intercepts in relation to planes in crystal structures
  • Investigate the significance of integer values in Miller indices
USEFUL FOR

Students studying crystallography, materials scientists, and anyone involved in solid-state physics who needs to understand the calculation of Miller indices in complex lattice structures.

Craptola
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I've come across a problem in a past paper while studying for exams, the solution is not given so I can only guess what I have to do, any guidance would be appreciated.

Homework Statement


Calculate the Miller indices of the shaded plane with respect to the three primitive lattice vectors shown. In fig 1 and 2.

Untitled_zps2bea7add.png

Homework Equations


n/a

The Attempt at a Solution


So figure 1 is quite obviously (1 1 1), I'm not sure how to handle figure 2. The way I was taught to calculate miller indices was pretty formulaic; Define an origin, look for intercepts with the lattice vectors, take the reciprocals and voila. I've never encountered a problem in which the lattice vectors aren't parallel to the edges of the cube and it's thrown me off a little.

Is it as simple as defining another set of axes parallel to the lattice vectors and extrapolating the plane to see where it intercepts those axes?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Craptola said:

The Attempt at a Solution


So figure 1 is quite obviously (1 1 1), I'm not sure how to handle figure 2. The way I was taught to calculate miller indices was pretty formulaic; Define an origin, look for intercepts with the lattice vectors, take the reciprocals and voila. I've never encountered a problem in which the lattice vectors aren't parallel to the edges of the cube and it's thrown me off a little.

Is it as simple as defining another set of axes parallel to the lattice vectors and extrapolating the plane to see where it intercepts those axes?

Yes. Find the components of the new lattice vectors in the "regular" coordinate system, and determine their intercept with the given plane, in terms of the given lattice constant. Than take the reciprocals.

ehild
 
Thanks. So would that make the correct answer (1 sqrt(2) 0)? Or have I completely butchered that. It looks like the plane will never intersect with a'3 making the intercept infinity the reciprocal of which being zero.
 
The sqrt(2) term is wrong. The Miller indices have to be integers. Find the intercept in terms of the base vectors. They need not be unit vectors.

ehild
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
18K