Question about miller indicies.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Craptola
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
Craptola
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I've come across a problem in a past paper while studying for exams, the solution is not given so I can only guess what I have to do, any guidance would be appreciated.

Homework Statement


Calculate the Miller indices of the shaded plane with respect to the three primitive lattice vectors shown. In fig 1 and 2.

Untitled_zps2bea7add.png

Homework Equations


n/a

The Attempt at a Solution


So figure 1 is quite obviously (1 1 1), I'm not sure how to handle figure 2. The way I was taught to calculate miller indices was pretty formulaic; Define an origin, look for intercepts with the lattice vectors, take the reciprocals and voila. I've never encountered a problem in which the lattice vectors aren't parallel to the edges of the cube and it's thrown me off a little.

Is it as simple as defining another set of axes parallel to the lattice vectors and extrapolating the plane to see where it intercepts those axes?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Craptola said:

The Attempt at a Solution


So figure 1 is quite obviously (1 1 1), I'm not sure how to handle figure 2. The way I was taught to calculate miller indices was pretty formulaic; Define an origin, look for intercepts with the lattice vectors, take the reciprocals and voila. I've never encountered a problem in which the lattice vectors aren't parallel to the edges of the cube and it's thrown me off a little.

Is it as simple as defining another set of axes parallel to the lattice vectors and extrapolating the plane to see where it intercepts those axes?

Yes. Find the components of the new lattice vectors in the "regular" coordinate system, and determine their intercept with the given plane, in terms of the given lattice constant. Than take the reciprocals.

ehild
 
Thanks. So would that make the correct answer (1 sqrt(2) 0)? Or have I completely butchered that. It looks like the plane will never intersect with a'3 making the intercept infinity the reciprocal of which being zero.