Question about momentum transfer

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of momentum transfer, particularly in the context of a Newton's Cradle. Participants explore the mechanics of how momentum is conserved and transferred through collisions, aiming for an intuitive understanding and accurate simulation of the phenomenon.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that momentum is conserved in a Newton's Cradle, suggesting that the effect of momentum transfer can be understood as if the original ball continued to travel without interruption.
  • Another participant argues that momentum transfer occurs much faster than the speed of the balls, potentially at the speed of sound in the material of the balls if they are perfectly elastic.
  • A further contribution explains that there are two mechanisms for momentum transfer: through the motion of the balls themselves and through the forces acting between the atoms in the material, with the latter occurring at the speed of sound in the material.
  • One participant reassures the original poster that confusion about these concepts is common in physics, drawing a parallel to the behavior of waves on water.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the speed of momentum transfer, with some asserting it occurs at the speed of sound in the material, while the original poster's intuition suggests a slower transfer. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the original poster's understanding of the mechanics involved.

Contextual Notes

There are assumptions regarding the elasticity of the balls and the conditions under which momentum transfer is analyzed. The discussion does not resolve the implications of energy loss or the specific conditions affecting momentum transfer in real-world scenarios.

WraithGlade
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hi.

I'm trying to figure out how transfer of momentum works so that I can simulate it reasonably accurately and understand it on an intuitive level.

My intuition goes like this:

Momentum must be conserved. Therefore, if for example I had a 1 meter long Newton's Cradle with numerous polished steel balls on it, spanning the whole length, then if a steel ball moving at 1 meter/sec collides head on with the left side of the array then the ball furthest to the right in the array will begin swinging away from the array exactly 1 second after the first ball collided with the left side.

In other words, my intuition is that in momentum space it would be as if the original ball had never collided at all and just continued traveling along the space. Whereas, in contrast, in physical space, this would amount to the momentum being transferred along the line in order to achieve the equivalent effect.

Is my intuition correct?

Is the amount of time momentum transfer requires in the presence of collisions equivalent to the amount of time the original momentum would have taken to traverse the system without the presence of the colliding bodies?

This is all of course assuming that no energy is lost anywhere.

Thanks for reading.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your intuition is wrong. The momentum transfer occurs much faster than the speed of the balls. If the balls were perfectly elastic I'm guessing that the momentum transfer would happen at the speed of sound in whatever material the balls were made out of.
 
seeing is believing

 
Last edited by a moderator:
There are two different mechanisms transferring the momentum here.

Before the impact, the momentum is being carried with the matter in the ball, as it moves. The "velocity of the momentum" is the same as the velocity of the ball, and could be anything.

The other mechanism is transferring momentum through a solid, by the forces acting between the atoms of the material. As #2 said, that always happens at the same speed, which is the speed of sound in the material. The speed of sound in most metals is about 5 times faster than in air.

But don't worry too much about being wrong here. The same sort of confusion can occur elsewhere in physics, for example the apparent speed of waves on the surface of water, compared with the motion of the water itself. The good thing is that you were thinking about what was going on.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K