B Question about Neon-burning Process

AI Thread Summary
In the neon-burning process in stars, two Neon-20 atoms do not fuse directly into Calcium-40 due to the sequence of reactions involved. Initially, Neon-20 undergoes photodisintegration, producing Oxygen-16 and an alpha particle. Under high temperatures, the alpha particle is captured by another Neon-20 nucleus, resulting in Magnesium-24 and releasing gamma radiation. This process requires two Neon nuclei: one to provide the alpha particle and another to absorb it, rather than a direct collision of two Neons. The overall reaction yields Oxygen-16 and Magnesium-24, along with energy.
DrLich
Messages
6
Reaction score
2
During the neon-burning process in stars, why do two Neon-20 atoms fuse into Oxygen-16 and Magnesium-24 instead of forming Calcium-40?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The 2Ne20->O16+Mg24+energy reaction is the nett result. It's actually two reactions.
First, neon is photodisintegrated into oxygen and an alpha particle:
Ne20+gamma->O16+He4
Normally the reverse reaction would occur, keeping the neon stock steady. But with sufficient temperature, alpha capture by another neon nucleus is preferred:
Ne20+He4->Mg24+gamma
So you need two neon nuclei, one to donate the alpha particle, the other to subsequently absorb it. It's not that the two neons collide, and two other nuclei pop out.

See e.g. here:
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0004-637X/797/2/83
 
  • Like
Likes Astronuc, Klystron and Baluncore
Bandersnatch said:
The 2Ne20->O16+Mg24+energy reaction is the nett result. It's actually two reactions.
First, neon is photodisintegrated into oxygen and an alpha particle:
Ne20+gamma->O16+He4
Normally the reverse reaction would occur, keeping the neon stock steady. But with sufficient temperature, alpha capture by another neon nucleus is preferred:
Ne20+He4->Mg24+gamma
So you need two neon nuclei, one to donate the alpha particle, the other to subsequently absorb it. It's not that the two neons collide, and two other nuclei pop out.

See e.g. here:
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0004-637X/797/2/83
Thank you very much!
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...

Similar threads

Back
Top