B Question about Neon-burning Process

AI Thread Summary
In the neon-burning process in stars, two Neon-20 atoms do not fuse directly into Calcium-40 due to the sequence of reactions involved. Initially, Neon-20 undergoes photodisintegration, producing Oxygen-16 and an alpha particle. Under high temperatures, the alpha particle is captured by another Neon-20 nucleus, resulting in Magnesium-24 and releasing gamma radiation. This process requires two Neon nuclei: one to provide the alpha particle and another to absorb it, rather than a direct collision of two Neons. The overall reaction yields Oxygen-16 and Magnesium-24, along with energy.
DrLich
Messages
6
Reaction score
2
During the neon-burning process in stars, why do two Neon-20 atoms fuse into Oxygen-16 and Magnesium-24 instead of forming Calcium-40?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The 2Ne20->O16+Mg24+energy reaction is the nett result. It's actually two reactions.
First, neon is photodisintegrated into oxygen and an alpha particle:
Ne20+gamma->O16+He4
Normally the reverse reaction would occur, keeping the neon stock steady. But with sufficient temperature, alpha capture by another neon nucleus is preferred:
Ne20+He4->Mg24+gamma
So you need two neon nuclei, one to donate the alpha particle, the other to subsequently absorb it. It's not that the two neons collide, and two other nuclei pop out.

See e.g. here:
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0004-637X/797/2/83
 
  • Like
Likes Astronuc, Klystron and Baluncore
Bandersnatch said:
The 2Ne20->O16+Mg24+energy reaction is the nett result. It's actually two reactions.
First, neon is photodisintegrated into oxygen and an alpha particle:
Ne20+gamma->O16+He4
Normally the reverse reaction would occur, keeping the neon stock steady. But with sufficient temperature, alpha capture by another neon nucleus is preferred:
Ne20+He4->Mg24+gamma
So you need two neon nuclei, one to donate the alpha particle, the other to subsequently absorb it. It's not that the two neons collide, and two other nuclei pop out.

See e.g. here:
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0004-637X/797/2/83
Thank you very much!
 
Today at about 4:30 am I saw the conjunction of Venus and Jupiter, where they were about the width of the full moon, or one half degree apart. Did anyone else see it? Edit: The moon is 2,200 miles in diameter and at a distance of 240,000 miles. Thereby it subtends an angle in radians of 2,200/240,000=.01 (approximately). With pi radians being 180 degrees, one radian is 57.3 degrees, so that .01 radians is about .50 degrees (angle subtended by the moon). (.57 to be more exact, but with...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Back
Top