Question about partial derivative relations for complex numbers

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the conversion of the partial derivative of a complex function, specifically ##\frac{\partial \psi(z)}{\partial z}##, into terms of its real components ##x## and ##y##, where ##z=x+iy##. The participants clarify that for a complex differentiable function ##\psi: \mathbb{C} \longrightarrow \mathbb{C}##, the Cauchy-Riemann equations must hold, leading to the relationships ##\frac{\partial u}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial v}{\partial y}## and ##\frac{\partial u}{\partial y} = -\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}##. The conversation also references the Weierstraß formula and Wirtinger derivatives as foundational tools for understanding these transformations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Complex analysis fundamentals
  • Cauchy-Riemann equations
  • Wirtinger derivatives
  • Real and complex function differentiation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Cauchy-Riemann equations in detail
  • Learn about Wirtinger derivatives and their applications
  • Explore the Weierstraß formula for complex functions
  • Investigate complex differentiability and its implications
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone studying complex analysis or working with complex functions and their derivatives.

binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12
Apologies this is probably a very bad question but it's been a while since I have seen this.

I have ##z=x+iy##. I need to convert ##\frac{\partial \psi(z)}{\partial z}## , with ##\psi## some function of ##z##, in terms of ##x## and ##y##
I have ##dz=dx+idy##. so
##\frac{\partial \psi }{\partial z}=\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x+i \partial y}##
But I am not sure how to simplify futher as I don't think you can't write
##\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x+i \partial y} = \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x} +\frac{1}{i}\frac{\partial \psi}{ \partial y}##?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Some function is little information. Say it is complex differentiable and ##\psi\, : \,\mathbb{C}\longrightarrow \mathbb{C}.## Then we have ##\psi(z)=\psi(x+iy)=u(x+iy)+i v(x+iy).## Written as real functions, we get ##u,v\, : \,\mathbb{R}^2\longrightarrow \mathbb{R}## with ##u(x,y)=u(x+iy)## and ##v(x,y)=v(x+iy).## It makes no sense to use different letters, but you can use a prime if you like since these equalities are not proper equalities, just correspondences. Now, you can consider the partial derivatives
$$
\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial x}\, , \,\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial y}\, , \,\dfrac{\partial v}{\partial x}\, , \,\dfrac{\partial v}{\partial y}
$$
In order to be complex differentiable, the complex derivative has to be complex linear, not only real linear. Thus we have the additional requirements
$$
\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial x}=\dfrac{\partial v}{\partial y}\;\text{ and }\;\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial y}=-\dfrac{\partial v}{\partial x}\quad (2)
$$

I would have approached it without the deviation along the real numbers and would have used the Weierstraß formula and complex linearity, but the above is how it is done with real components and the Cauchy-Riemann equations (2).

https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/an-overview-of-complex-differentiation-and-integration/
could also be helpful.
 
Last edited:
binbagsss said:
Apologies this is probably a very bad question but it's been a while since I have seen this.

I have ##z=x+iy##. I need to convert ##\frac{\partial \psi(z)}{\partial z}## , with ##\psi## some function of ##z##, in terms of ##x## and ##y##
I have ##dz=dx+idy##. so
##\frac{\partial \psi }{\partial z}=\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x+i \partial y}##
But I am not sure how to simplify futher as I don't think you can't write
##\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x+i \partial y} = \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x} +\frac{1}{i}\frac{\partial \psi}{ \partial y}##?

Thanks
##\frac{\partial f}{\partial z}=\frac12\left( \frac{\partial f}{\partial x} -i\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}\right)##
 
binbagsss said:
I have dz=dx+idy. so

Your "so" does not follow. It does not work that way for multiple reasons, but the very first thing you should be concerned with is that you use ##d## before "so" and ##\partial## after.
 
fresh_42 said:
Some function is little information. Say it is complex differentiable and ##\psi\, : \,\mathbb{C}\longrightarrow \mathbb{C}.## Then we have ##\psi(z)=\psi(x+iy)=u(x+iy)+i v(x+iy).## Written as real functions, we get ##u,v\, : \,\mathbb{R}^2\longrightarrow \mathbb{R}## with ##u(x,y)=u(x+iy)## and ##v(x,y)=v(x+iy).## It makes no sense to use different letters, but you can use a prime if you like since these equalities are not proper equalities, just correspondences. Now, you can consider the partial derivatives
$$
\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial x}\, , \,\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial y}\, , \,\dfrac{\partial v}{\partial x}\, , \,\dfrac{\partial v}{\partial y}
$$
In order to be complex differentiable, the complex derivative has to be complex linear, not only real linear. Thus we have the additional requirements
$$
\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial x}=\dfrac{\partial v}{\partial y}\;\text{ and }\;\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial y}=-\dfrac{\partial v}{\partial x}\quad (2)
$$

I would have approached it without the deviation along the real numbers and would have used the Weierstraß formula and complex linearity, but the above is how it is done with real components and the Cauchy-Riemann equations (2).

https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/an-overview-of-complex-differentiation-and-integration/
could also be helpful.
in the context of the problem I have, I am pretty certain one does not want to introduce ##\Re(\psi)## and ##\Im(\psi)##
 
binbagsss said:
in the context of the problem I have, I am pretty certain one does not want to introduce ##\Re(\psi)## and ##\Im(\psi)##
Then why do you want to split ##z##?
 
binbagsss said:
in the context of the problem I have, I am pretty certain one does not want to introduce ##\Re(\psi)## and ##\Im(\psi)##
The steps you wrote are meaningless. The answer you wrote is of by a factor of one half. I wrote the usual form. Doesn't that answer your question?
 
martinbn said:
The steps you wrote are meaningless. The answer you wrote is of by a factor of one half. I wrote the usual form. Doesn't that answer your question?
yes it does, yes apologies i did miss the factor of 1/2- had a bad signal your reply did not load. ty. can you show me how you get to that properly, if it is meaningless to write:

##\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial z}=\frac{\partial \psi}{\frac{1}{2}\left(\partial x + i \partial y\right)} ## and try to simplify this..
 
binbagsss said:
yes it does, yes apologies i did miss the factor of 1/2- had a bad signal your reply did not load. ty. can you show me how you get to that properly, if it is meaningless to write:

##\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial z}=\frac{\partial \psi}{\frac{1}{2}\left(\partial x + i \partial y\right)} ## and try to simplify this..
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wirtinger_derivatives

It comes from ##x=\dfrac{1}{2}(z+\overline{z})## and ##y=\dfrac{i}{2}(\overline{z}-z)## and ##d\psi =\dfrac{\partial \psi}{\partial x}dx +\dfrac{\partial \psi}{\partial y}dy.##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SammyS and binbagsss
  • #10

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
391
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K