I Question about partial derivative relations for complex numbers

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on converting the partial derivative of a complex function, ##\frac{\partial \psi(z)}{\partial z}##, into terms of real variables ##x## and ##y##. It highlights the necessity of using the Cauchy-Riemann equations to ensure complex differentiability, leading to relationships between the partial derivatives of the real and imaginary components of the function. The conversation also addresses the correct application of the factor of one-half in the context of complex differentiation, emphasizing the distinction between ##d## and ##\partial##. Participants clarify the importance of maintaining consistency in notation and the implications of complex linearity in derivatives. The discussion concludes with references to the Wirtinger derivatives for further understanding of the topic.
binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12
Apologies this is probably a very bad question but it's been a while since I have seen this.

I have ##z=x+iy##. I need to convert ##\frac{\partial \psi(z)}{\partial z}## , with ##\psi## some function of ##z##, in terms of ##x## and ##y##
I have ##dz=dx+idy##. so
##\frac{\partial \psi }{\partial z}=\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x+i \partial y}##
But I am not sure how to simplify futher as I don't think you can't write
##\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x+i \partial y} = \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x} +\frac{1}{i}\frac{\partial \psi}{ \partial y}##?

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Some function is little information. Say it is complex differentiable and ##\psi\, : \,\mathbb{C}\longrightarrow \mathbb{C}.## Then we have ##\psi(z)=\psi(x+iy)=u(x+iy)+i v(x+iy).## Written as real functions, we get ##u,v\, : \,\mathbb{R}^2\longrightarrow \mathbb{R}## with ##u(x,y)=u(x+iy)## and ##v(x,y)=v(x+iy).## It makes no sense to use different letters, but you can use a prime if you like since these equalities are not proper equalities, just correspondences. Now, you can consider the partial derivatives
$$
\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial x}\, , \,\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial y}\, , \,\dfrac{\partial v}{\partial x}\, , \,\dfrac{\partial v}{\partial y}
$$
In order to be complex differentiable, the complex derivative has to be complex linear, not only real linear. Thus we have the additional requirements
$$
\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial x}=\dfrac{\partial v}{\partial y}\;\text{ and }\;\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial y}=-\dfrac{\partial v}{\partial x}\quad (2)
$$

I would have approached it without the deviation along the real numbers and would have used the Weierstraß formula and complex linearity, but the above is how it is done with real components and the Cauchy-Riemann equations (2).

https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/an-overview-of-complex-differentiation-and-integration/
could also be helpful.
 
Last edited:
binbagsss said:
Apologies this is probably a very bad question but it's been a while since I have seen this.

I have ##z=x+iy##. I need to convert ##\frac{\partial \psi(z)}{\partial z}## , with ##\psi## some function of ##z##, in terms of ##x## and ##y##
I have ##dz=dx+idy##. so
##\frac{\partial \psi }{\partial z}=\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x+i \partial y}##
But I am not sure how to simplify futher as I don't think you can't write
##\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x+i \partial y} = \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x} +\frac{1}{i}\frac{\partial \psi}{ \partial y}##?

Thanks
##\frac{\partial f}{\partial z}=\frac12\left( \frac{\partial f}{\partial x} -i\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}\right)##
 
binbagsss said:
I have dz=dx+idy. so

Your "so" does not follow. It does not work that way for multiple reasons, but the very first thing you should be concerned with is that you use ##d## before "so" and ##\partial## after.
 
fresh_42 said:
Some function is little information. Say it is complex differentiable and ##\psi\, : \,\mathbb{C}\longrightarrow \mathbb{C}.## Then we have ##\psi(z)=\psi(x+iy)=u(x+iy)+i v(x+iy).## Written as real functions, we get ##u,v\, : \,\mathbb{R}^2\longrightarrow \mathbb{R}## with ##u(x,y)=u(x+iy)## and ##v(x,y)=v(x+iy).## It makes no sense to use different letters, but you can use a prime if you like since these equalities are not proper equalities, just correspondences. Now, you can consider the partial derivatives
$$
\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial x}\, , \,\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial y}\, , \,\dfrac{\partial v}{\partial x}\, , \,\dfrac{\partial v}{\partial y}
$$
In order to be complex differentiable, the complex derivative has to be complex linear, not only real linear. Thus we have the additional requirements
$$
\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial x}=\dfrac{\partial v}{\partial y}\;\text{ and }\;\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial y}=-\dfrac{\partial v}{\partial x}\quad (2)
$$

I would have approached it without the deviation along the real numbers and would have used the Weierstraß formula and complex linearity, but the above is how it is done with real components and the Cauchy-Riemann equations (2).

https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/an-overview-of-complex-differentiation-and-integration/
could also be helpful.
in the context of the problem I have, I am pretty certain one does not want to introduce ##\Re(\psi)## and ##\Im(\psi)##
 
binbagsss said:
in the context of the problem I have, I am pretty certain one does not want to introduce ##\Re(\psi)## and ##\Im(\psi)##
Then why do you want to split ##z##?
 
binbagsss said:
in the context of the problem I have, I am pretty certain one does not want to introduce ##\Re(\psi)## and ##\Im(\psi)##
The steps you wrote are meaningless. The answer you wrote is of by a factor of one half. I wrote the usual form. Doesn't that answer your question?
 
martinbn said:
The steps you wrote are meaningless. The answer you wrote is of by a factor of one half. I wrote the usual form. Doesn't that answer your question?
yes it does, yes apologies i did miss the factor of 1/2- had a bad signal your reply did not load. ty. can you show me how you get to that properly, if it is meaningless to write:

##\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial z}=\frac{\partial \psi}{\frac{1}{2}\left(\partial x + i \partial y\right)} ## and try to simplify this..
 
binbagsss said:
yes it does, yes apologies i did miss the factor of 1/2- had a bad signal your reply did not load. ty. can you show me how you get to that properly, if it is meaningless to write:

##\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial z}=\frac{\partial \psi}{\frac{1}{2}\left(\partial x + i \partial y\right)} ## and try to simplify this..
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wirtinger_derivatives

It comes from ##x=\dfrac{1}{2}(z+\overline{z})## and ##y=\dfrac{i}{2}(\overline{z}-z)## and ##d\psi =\dfrac{\partial \psi}{\partial x}dx +\dfrac{\partial \psi}{\partial y}dy.##
 
  • Like
Likes SammyS and binbagsss
  • #10

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
56
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top