Question about Renormalization Group Equation

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 3K views
Phileas.Fogg
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Hello,
in our lecture, we computed [tex]\beta^{\overline{MS}} , \gamma_m^{\overline{MS}}[/tex] for [tex]- \frac{\lambda}{4!} \phi^4[/tex] Theory.

These are:

[tex] <br /> \beta^{\overline{MS}} (\lambda_{\overline{MS}}) = b_1 \lambda_{\overline{MS}}^2 + O(\lambda_{\overline{MS}}^3)[/tex]

[tex] \gamma_m^{\overline{MS}} (\lambda_{\overline{MS}}) = d_1 \lambda_{\overline{MS}} + O(\lambda_{\overline{MS}}^2)[/tex]

Is there any change, if one goes to a [tex]- \frac{\lambda}{4!} \phi^2[/tex] Theory?

I think that the Lagrangian changes to:

[tex]L = \frac{1}{2} Z (\partial_{\mu} \phi_R)^2 - \frac{1}{2} m_0^2 Z \phi_R^2 - \frac{\lambda_0}{4!} Z \phi_R^2[/tex]

But that has no effect on computing the beta- and gamma-function. Am I right?

Regards,
Mr. Fogg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A quadratic term like that is simply a mass term, with the mass played by the coefficient in front of the quadratic term. In the absence of interactions you would be dealing with a free theory, so all renormalization equations would turn out to be quite trivial.

The way to see it is to notice that the real mass term in the Lagrangian you wrote down is:

[tex]M^2\phi^2 = (\frac{1}{2}m_0^2Z-\frac{\lambda_0}{4!}Z)\phi^2[/tex]

The coefficient for the [tex]\phi^4[/tex] is simply zero. But in the renormalization equations you wrote down there is no reference to the mass term, only to the interaction coupling constant. But that coefficient is zero...

Renormalization really only plays a role when you are dealing with interactions.
 
Hello,
thanks for your answer.

xepma said:
In the absence of interactions you would be dealing with a free theory, so all renormalization equations would turn out to be quite trivial.

So I compute the beta- and gamma-function in the same way, we did for phi^4 - Theory?

And the result is exactly the same like for phi^4-Theory?

Regards,
Mr. Fogg