Question about shifting the indexes [nth powers] and counting numbers of series?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the manipulation of series, specifically focusing on the implications of multiplying a series by a variable, such as x, and how this affects the index of summation and the starting point of the series. The context includes Taylor series and power series, with particular attention to the nth powers and counting numbers involved in these series.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore whether changing the nth power of x necessitates a change in the starting index of the series. Questions arise about the consistency of these changes across different problems and whether it is mandatory to adjust both the index and the counting number.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide insights into the relationship between the index and the starting number when modifying a series. There is an ongoing exploration of different interpretations and approaches to the problem, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion over varying practices in problems they have encountered, noting that some problems change both the index and the starting number while others do not. This inconsistency contributes to the uncertainty in their understanding.

nontradstuden
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
Question about shifting the indexes [nth powers] and counting numbers of series?
When you multiply a series by x, therefore changing the nth power on x, is it mandatory that you change the number where you start counting? This is confusing me because some problems do both, where others explain it in two different separate steps.

Basically,
If I am multiplying a taylor series by x, then am I supposed to add one to the index AND count one lower? or is it only mandatory to change the power on x, not the counting number?

If the index [nth power on x] is changed, is it mandatory to change where the series starts counting at?

I keep seeing problems where they only change one, and not the others. I thought you're supposed to replace all n's by the new relation.

I hope this makes sense, lol.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If your series is [itex]\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_nx^n[/itex] and you multiply by x, you will have [itex]\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_nx^{n+1}[/itex]. You can, although you don't have to let j= n+1. Then n= j- 1 so [itex]a_n= a_{j-1}[/itex] and the lower limit n= j-1= 0 become j=1. That is the series changes to [itex]\sum_{j=1}^\infty a_{j-1}x^j[/itex].
 
@HallsofIvy,

Thanks for answering!

I have a couple more questions, if you will...

If you change the starting number of the series, then you don't have to change 'n' everywhere else? or not.

If you change the nth power on 'x' w/o multiplying by another 'x', then you must / don't have to change the starting number of the series?


I haven't had a problem with changing n everywhere before, but I'm working a problem where I'm not getting the right solution.

It's a problem where I'm multiplying a power series of (x-1)^(n-1) by x, so I changed x to [1+ (x-1)], but it isn't working out right.
 
nontradstuden said:
...

I haven't had a problem with changing n everywhere before, but I'm working a problem where I'm not getting the right solution.

It's a problem where I'm multiplying a power series of (x-1)^(n-1) by x, so I changed x to [1+ (x-1)], but it isn't working out right.
So that gives you x(x-1)(n-1) = [1+ (x-1)](x-1)(n-1) = (x-1)(n-1) + (x-1)(n).

In this case it looks like shifting the index on either one of the series may simplify things.



.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K