Question about stall warning system

  • Thread starter Thread starter Boeing707
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    System
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 2K views
Boeing707
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
My question is how precise is the stall warning vane in detecting the stagnation point on the wing?

The lift transducer is an LVDT so electrically speaking it is a continuous signal. But when approaching a stall, could the vane be held in between center and full deflection for a few seconds? (The vane is spring loaded to center, not sure of the exact force required to move but feels very light to touch).

Or maybe a better question: If the airflow at the stagnation point is 0 (vane center), does the airflow around the stagnation point slowly increase (vane in between center and full deflection) or is it pretty much full speed (vane instantly deflects to full position)?

The aircraft is of the 707 variant.
 
Stall warning is a safety feature, thus it is designed to trigger before the wing actually reaches stall, so that the pilot has sufficient time to react.

If I remember correctly they usually start sounding 2-3 degrees before the critical angle. But the critical angle depends heavily on flap position and wing contamination. The former can be taken into account when designing the control circuitry/program for the stall warning system, but the letter can be an issue, thus some aircraft may start giving the stall warning around 5 degrees prior to the critical aoa. What are actual current offset values, for these systems, I don’t know.

Historically there have been quite a few different designs, some worked like on/off switches, others were incremental or continuous. As far as I know only the letter are in use today and they give the pilot an incremental feedback (sound and stick shaking) on how near stall they are.