Question about substitution in limits?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Kratos321
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limits Substitution
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the use of substitution in calculating limits, specifically focusing on the limit of the function sin(x)/x as x approaches 0. Participants explore the implications of using radians versus degrees in this context, examining the behavior of the function under different angle measures.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the validity of substituting values in degrees versus radians when evaluating the limit of sin(x)/x as x approaches 0.
  • Another participant asserts that the sine function must be evaluated in radians for the limit to approach 1, emphasizing that sin(x) and x must both be in the same unit.
  • A different viewpoint suggests that working with degrees can be seen as a rescaling of the angle, proposing that the limit can still be approached correctly through appropriate transformations.
  • Some participants discuss the differing rates at which sin(x) in degrees and radians approach zero, noting that they are fundamentally different functions due to their definitions.
  • One participant introduces L'Hôpital's rule and Taylor's theorem as methods to analyze the limit, while others clarify that scaling the input without adjusting the sine function leads to incorrect results.
  • There is a contention regarding the interpretation of scaling and whether it was applied consistently in the arguments presented.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the treatment of angles in degrees versus radians, with no consensus reached on the implications of using one over the other in the context of limits. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to take when substituting values in different units.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of maintaining consistent units when evaluating trigonometric functions and limits, but the discussion reveals a lack of clarity on how rescaling should be applied in practice. There are also unresolved mathematical steps related to the application of L'Hôpital's rule and Taylor's theorem.

Kratos321
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
okay so I just have a question about using substitution when solving limits.

Say I have the function sinx/x, if i want to find the limit when x--> 0 using approximation ( i know how to prove it with the pinching theorem by the way). So if I substitute 0.0000000001 rad into the function i get something close to 1. However if i substitute that many DEGREES I am waaaaaaaayyyyy off. I know a rad is a lot more than a degree but if i draw the graphs for both wouldn't i see that the limit is 1 for both the rad graf and the degree. (This isn't an actual question where i have to use substitution but i was just experimenting and am kinda wondering...).
any explanations would be appreciated.

thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure you're expressing _both_ sinx and x in degrees when you do your calculation?
 
sinx/x -> 1, only when the argument of the sin is in radians. Mathematically, the argument for all trig functions (when being considered as functions) has to be in radians.
 
What I meant is you can look at working with degrees as just rescaling by 2Pi, i.e., start with 360=2Pi , and rescale any angle . If x->0 , then x':=2Pix/360 is a rescaling, and
sinx'/x' also goes to 1 .
 
yeah that's what i figured but is there a reason or explanation for it?
 
Kratos321 said:
yeah that's what i figured but is there a reason or explanation for it?

sin(xr) and sin(xd) (where xr and xd represent "radian x" and "degree x") are different functions, that's all. Namely, sin(xd) = sin(pi/180 xr). And so reasonably, the two functions would approach zero at different "speeds".
 
Re: Different Speeds (My 'quote' is not working)

Char Limit: the rescaling here makes no difference at the end, e.g., try

L'Hopital:

Sin(kx)/kx --> kCos(kx)/k= Cos(kx) , goes to 1 as x->0 , since k<oo ; just use, e.g

Taylor's Thm.
 
Bacle said:
Re: Different Speeds (My 'quote' is not working)

Char Limit: the rescaling here makes no difference at the end, e.g., try

L'Hopital:

Sin(kx)/kx --> kCos(kx)/k= Cos(kx) , goes to 1 as x->0 , since k<oo ; just use, e.g

Taylor's Thm.

Incorrect. It makes no difference if you scale x similarly, but just using the "degree sine" function without scaling x WILL make it change. We know this:

[tex]\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{sin_r(x)}{x} = 0[/tex]

where sinr(x) represents the "radian sine" function, which is the usual sine function. For reference, sind(x), representing the "degree sine" function, is equal to sinr(pi/180 x). So therefore:

[tex]\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{sin_d(x)}{x} = \frac{sin_r\left(\frac{\pi}{180} x\right)}{x} = \frac{\pi}{180}[/tex]

You see why, I hope.
 
I only referred to a scaling, not a change into degrees; still, sinx is defined in R, i.e.,

for all reals.

And what's with the 'I Hope' ?
 
  • #10
And, BTW, I clearly stated that the rescaling should be done both with the argument

and with x, and my argument reflects that ; I think you misunderstood/misinterpreted

my answer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K