Is Coefficient Pairing in Polynomials Justifiable Through Equality Definition?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter aikismos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polynomial Terminology
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the justification of coefficient pairing in polynomials through the definition of polynomial equality. Participants confirm that when two polynomial expressions are equal, their corresponding coefficients must also be equal, as demonstrated with the example of the equation 3x² + bx = ax² + 5x, leading to a = 3 and b = 5. Additionally, the expression P(x) = ax² + bx can be used to indicate that P(x) has no constant term by stating P(0) = 0. The rigorous justification involves recognizing that polynomial equality implies the independence of the coefficients.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polynomial equality and its implications
  • Familiarity with partial fraction decomposition techniques
  • Knowledge of vector representation in polynomial contexts
  • Basic principles of calculus, specifically the concept of independence of functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of polynomial equality in depth
  • Learn about partial fraction decomposition in algebra
  • Explore the Wronskian and its application in determining function independence
  • Investigate the implications of coefficient comparison in higher-degree polynomials
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebra students, and educators seeking to deepen their understanding of polynomial functions and their properties, particularly in the context of equality and coefficient analysis.

aikismos
Messages
145
Reaction score
34
Just to double check, but if one wanted to, like in partial fraction decomposition, associate literal coefficients of polynomials with corresponding unknowns on the other side of the equation, the justification for this action is the definition of equality of polynomials?

EDIT: I know this isn't true. Let's see, ## a - b = 2 ## is as far as it can be reduced.
## 3x^2 + bx = ax^2 + 5x \rightarrow a = 3, b = 5 ##

Another related question is how do I express symbolically that in:

## P(x) = ax^2 + bx ##

P(x) has no constant term?

I'm kinda groping around for a rigorous way to express and justify the pairing of coefficients if you were to write them as two equivalent n-tuples.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I would put everything on the same side and group similar powers of ##x## like this: ##(3-a)x^2+(b-5)x = 0 ##. Since this is true for all ## x ##, and since ## x ## and ## x^2 ## are independent functions (their Wronskian does not vanish), their coefficients must separately each be zero. This is a lot like having, for arrow vectors in the plane, that ## (3-a)\mathbf{i}+(b-5)\mathbf{j} = 0 ##. The only way to add a vector in the ## \mathbf{i} ## direction to one in the ## \mathbf{j}## direction and get zero is if, in fact, both vectors are the zero vector.

For the second question, how about writing it as ## P(0) = 0 ##?
 
aikismos said:
Just to double check, but if one wanted to, like in partial fraction decomposition, associate literal coefficients of polynomials with corresponding unknowns on the other side of the equation, the justification for this action is the definition of equality of polynomials?

EDIT: I know this isn't true. Let's see, ## a - b = 2 ## is as far as it can be reduced.
## 3x^2 + bx = ax^2 + 5x \rightarrow a = 3, b = 5 ##

Another related question is how do I express symbolically that in:

## P(x) = ax^2 + bx ##

P(x) has no constant term?

I'm kinda groping around for a rigorous way to express and justify the pairing of coefficients if you were to write them as two equivalent n-tuples.
In partial fractions decomposition, you're setting up an equation that is true for all values of the independent variable (except those that make any denominator zero). IOW, two expressions that are identically equal.
So, for ## 3x^2 + bx = ax^2 + 5x##, for all x, it must be the case that a = 3 and b = 5.
 
Thanks guys!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K