Question about the relative motion of an eye relative to light source

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of the second postulate of relativity to a scenario involving an eye moving towards or away from a light source. The user proposes that if the eye moves towards the light source at a velocity v, the time taken for light to reach the eye is calculated as D/(c + v). Conversely, if the eye moves away, the time is D/(c - v). Participants confirm that these calculations are valid within the specified frame of reference and emphasize that the results align with the principles of relativity without contradiction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the second postulate of relativity
  • Familiarity with the Michelson-Morley experiment
  • Basic knowledge of relative motion and velocity
  • Concept of light speed (c) in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the second postulate of relativity in various frames of reference
  • Explore the Michelson-Morley experiment and its significance in physics
  • Learn about the differences between Newtonian physics and relativistic physics
  • Investigate conservation laws in the context of special relativity
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in the principles of relativity and the behavior of light in relative motion scenarios.

Chenkel
Messages
482
Reaction score
109
Hello everyone,

I've been thinking about 2nd postulate of relativity, it seems that and the Michaelson-Morley experiment seems to imply that there is no ether, but I was thinking about a special situation that doesn't seem to go against that postulate.

I think my question is basic so hopefully it makes sense and I don't make any major blunders.

Suppose there is an initial light source at distance D away from an eye and the light turns on at the start of the problem, and the eye moves with a relative velocity of v towards the light source, how long does it take light to reach the eye?

I was thinking about it and the gap seems to be closing at a rate of ##c + v## So I would expect the light to reach the eye at the time ##\frac {D} {c + v}##

If the eye is moving away from the light source at the start of the problem when it turns on at a distance D I would imagine the gap to be closing at a rate of ##{c - v}## so the time to cover the distance D should be ##\frac {D} {c - v}##

Hopefully I'm not making any major mistakes in my analysis, let me know what you think.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the rest frame of the light source where the eye is moving, yes, these are the expressions. It is unclear why you think this affects the results predicted by relativity.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and russ_watters
Orodruin said:
In the rest frame of the light source where the eye is moving, yes, these are the expressions. It is unclear why you think this affects the results predicted by relativity.
I don't think it affects the results predicted by relativity, I'm just trying to make sure I'm not making any mistakes regarding the postulates of relativity and the framework of it.
 
Chenkel said:
I don't think it affects the results predicted by relativity, I'm just trying to make sure I'm not making any mistakes regarding the postulates of relativity and the framework of it.
You have specified everything in one frame here, so the same intercept calculations you do in Newtonian physics apply. It's only when you want to do more complex physics (conservation laws or frame changes, for example) that you will find differences.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Chenkel

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
551
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K