Question about the remainder of a division

  • Thread starter Thread starter pc2-brazil
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Division Remainder
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mathematical proof of the expression (2a-1) mod (2b-1) = 2a mod b-1 for positive integers a and b. The user presents a solution by analyzing three cases: a = b, a < b, and a > b, confirming the theorem in each scenario. A suggestion is made to enhance rigor by substituting bitstrings with their corresponding sums, providing a clearer mathematical foundation for the proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of modular arithmetic
  • Familiarity with discrete mathematics concepts
  • Knowledge of binary representation and bitstrings
  • Ability to manipulate exponential expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study modular arithmetic properties in depth
  • Explore proofs involving binary representations
  • Learn about the application of bitstrings in discrete mathematics
  • Investigate rigorous proof techniques in mathematical analysis
USEFUL FOR

Students of discrete mathematics, mathematicians seeking to understand modular arithmetic, and educators looking for proof strategies in mathematical discussions.

pc2-brazil
Messages
198
Reaction score
3
I was self-studying Discrete Mathematics and I found the following problem.

Homework Statement
Show that whenever a and b are positive integers, then
[tex](2^a-1)\mod(2^b-1)=2^{a\mod b}-1[/tex]

The attempt at a solution
I don't know if there is a more rigorous way of solving it, but I came up with the following solution:
I will split it in three cases: [itex]a=b[/itex], [itex]a<b[/itex] and [itex]a>b[/itex].
If a = b, the remainder is zero, and [itex]2^{a\mod b}-1[/itex]=[itex]2^0-1=0[/itex], confirming the theorem for this case.
If [itex]a<b[/itex]:
Because [itex]a<b[/itex], [itex]2^a-1<2^b-1[/itex], therefore
[tex](2^a-1)\mod(2^b-1)=2^{a}-1=2^{a\mod b}-1[/tex]
If [itex]a>b[/itex]:
The numbers [itex]2^a-1[/itex] and [itex]2^b-1[/itex] are the decimal equivalents of the largest binary (base 2) numbers which can be written with a and b digits, respectively. Thus, these bitstrings (binary numbers) will contain only '1's as their digits.
The remainder of the division of the bitstrings consisting of only a and b '1's, with [itex]a>b[/itex], will be the largest bitstring with [itex]a\mod b[/itex] digits (a bitstring consisting of only [itex]a\mod b[/itex] '1's).
This is true because, if we take the number with a '1's and subtract from it the bitstring with [itex]a\mod b[/itex] '1's, the result will be a number with a digits, beginning with b '1's and ending with [itex]a\mod b[/itex] zeroes. Therefore, this result will be divisible by b, and the remainder will be the bitstring with [itex]a\mod b[/itex] '1's.
So, the decimal representation of this remainder is [itex]2^{a\mod b}-1[/itex], confirming that
[tex](2^a-1)\mod(2^b-1)=2^{a\mod b}-1[/tex]

Is there a more rigorous way of showing this?

Thank you in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi pc2-brazil! :smile:

pc2-brazil said:
I was self-studying Discrete Mathematics and I found the following problem.

Homework Statement
Show that whenever a and b are positive integers, then
[tex](2^a-1)\mod(2^b-1)=2^{a\mod b}-1[/tex]

The attempt at a solution
I don't know if there is a more rigorous way of solving it, but I came up with the following solution:
I will split it in three cases: [itex]a=b[/itex], [itex]a<b[/itex] and [itex]a>b[/itex].
If a = b, the remainder is zero, and [itex]2^{a\mod b}-1[/itex]=[itex]2^0-1=0[/itex], confirming the theorem for this case.
If [itex]a<b[/itex]:
Because [itex]a<b[/itex], [itex]2^a-1<2^b-1[/itex], therefore
[tex](2^a-1)\mod(2^b-1)=2^{a}-1=2^{a\mod b}-1[/tex]
If [itex]a>b[/itex]:
The numbers [itex]2^a-1[/itex] and [itex]2^b-1[/itex] are the decimal equivalents of the largest binary (base 2) numbers which can be written with a and b digits, respectively. Thus, these bitstrings (binary numbers) will contain only '1's as their digits.
The remainder of the division of the bitstrings consisting of only a and b '1's, with [itex]a>b[/itex], will be the largest bitstring with [itex]a\mod b[/itex] digits (a bitstring consisting of only [itex]a\mod b[/itex] '1's).
This is true because, if we take the number with a '1's and subtract from it the bitstring with [itex]a\mod b[/itex] '1's, the result will be a number with a digits, beginning with b '1's and ending with [itex]a\mod b[/itex] zeroes. Therefore, this result will be divisible by b, and the remainder will be the bitstring with [itex]a\mod b[/itex] '1's.
So, the decimal representation of this remainder is [itex]2^{a\mod b}-1[/itex], confirming that
[tex](2^a-1)\mod(2^b-1)=2^{a\mod b}-1[/tex]

Is there a more rigorous way of showing this?

Thank you in advance.

Indeed, working with bitstrings isn't the most rigorous thing around. But there's a very easy way to make this thing rigorous. Just exchange the bitstring with a sum. For example

[tex]11001=2^5+2^4+1~\text{and}~111111=2^6+2^5+2^4+2^3+2^2+2+1[/tex]

So just exchange each occurrence of the bitstring with such a sum.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K