Question about the Signs of Rotational Motion

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the conventions for defining positive and negative directions in angular acceleration, particularly in the context of pulley systems. Participants explore how these choices affect the relationship between angular and linear acceleration, as well as the implications for solving problems involving motion and forces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about how to define positive and negative directions in angular acceleration within pulley systems and questions the impact of these choices on linear acceleration.
  • Another participant mentions the importance of understanding torque as a vector quantity and suggests that familiarity with cross products can help clarify directionality.
  • A participant considers using the cross product to determine the direction of acceleration but remains uncertain about the method.
  • It is noted that the right-hand rule is typically used to define the relationship between coordinate system axes and rotation direction, which can help avoid confusion.
  • One participant advises that choosing positive directions should minimize confusion and mistakes, suggesting that signs in equations should be consistent, especially in static force equilibrium.
  • Another participant emphasizes that while it is customary to define counter-clockwise as positive and clockwise as negative for rotational motion, this is not a strict requirement, provided consistency is maintained.
  • There is a reiteration of the idea that the choice of positive direction for X and Y coordinates in a plane will influence the positive direction of Z and all rotations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of defining positive and negative directions for clarity and consistency in problem-solving. However, there are multiple competing views regarding the specific conventions that should be adopted, and the discussion remains unresolved on the best approach to take.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the potential for confusion arising from different coordinate systems and the subjective nature of defining positive and negative directions. The discussion does not resolve how these definitions impact the overall analysis of motion in pulley systems.

rashida564
Messages
220
Reaction score
7
I got a confusion about the sings in the angular acceleration. When dealing with system of pulleys, how to define where is the positive and negative direction of the motion and will the choose of positive direction of angular acceleration will effect the positive direction of linear acceleration
 

Attachments

  • Torque.PNG
    Torque.PNG
    8.7 KB · Views: 239
Physics news on Phys.org
Yeah, I am thinking of doing it slowly by the cross product, but I am not sure how to find the direction of the acceleration
 
rashida564 said:
Summary:: Positive and negative accelaration

I got a confusion about the sings in the angular acceleration. When dealing with system of pulleys, how to define where is the positive and negative direction of the motion and will the choose of positive direction of angular acceleration will effect the positive direction of linear acceleration
Typically, the relationship between the coordinate system axes and the direction of rotation is defined by the right-hand rule. Anything else will cause a lot of confusion.

In your example, you can chose between a couple of coordinate systems that follow the right-hand rule and can have the positive rotations when facing the page to be either clockwise or counterclockwise.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU
As mentioned already, you want in general to choose positive directions such that the amount of confusion and risk of mistakes are low. Since choice of orientation ends up as signs in equations it is often good to choose such that signs for each term are either all plus or minus (when writing static force equilibrium in the form ##\Sigma F_i = 0##).

For simple setups, like the one you showed, where the system readily can be modeled with one degree of freedom (in your case that could be the vertical position of the mass), it would be natural to select positive rotation of each wheel such that it rotates in its positive direction when the mass moves in positive direction (assuming no-slip between string and wheels).

This would of course mean that positive rotation of the two wheels would be opposite each other when compared in their original setup and if this is a problem for some reason, it would also be perfectly OK to select a different orientation as long as you modeled this with proper signs in the equations.
 
In any problem involving motion or force, the person solving the problem must decide which direction is "positive" and which is "negative". It is customary to make "up" or "right" positive and "down" or "left" negative but that is not necessary. It is customary to make "counter-clockwise" positive and "clockwise" negative for rotational motion but that is not necessary. Of course, once you have made such an assignment, you must be consistent.
 
HallsofIvy said:
In any problem involving motion or force, the person solving the problem must decide which direction is "positive" and which is "negative". It is customary to make "up" or "right" positive and "down" or "left" negative but that is not necessary. It is customary to make "counter-clockwise" positive and "clockwise" negative for rotational motion but that is not necessary. Of course, once you have made such an assignment, you must be consistent.
One should always use right-hand coordinate systems. So deciding on the positive direction for X and Y in a plane would define the positive direction of Z and of all the rotations.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K