Question about this equation for the expectation value

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the notation of expectation values in quantum mechanics (QM) as presented in a NMR textbook. The formula for expectation values is given by $$<\hat{X}>=\int_{-\infty}^\infty\psi^*x\psi dx$$, with the integral of probability density $$\int \psi^*\psi dx$$ included in the denominator. This inclusion is necessary because the textbook does not assume that the wave function $$\psi$$ is normalized, contrasting with typical QM textbooks that omit this term under the assumption of normalization.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with wave functions and their properties
  • Knowledge of normalization in quantum mechanics
  • Basic calculus for evaluating integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of wave function normalization in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about expectation values in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the role of probability density in quantum mechanics
  • Review the University of Cambridge's "Introduction to NMR" lectures for practical applications
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those studying NMR, as well as educators looking for clear explanations of expectation values and normalization in wave functions.

docnet
Messages
796
Reaction score
486
TL;DR
please see below
Hi all,

I found this notation of expectation values in a NMR text.

In class, I learned that expectation values are given by
$$<\hat{X}>=\int_{-\infty}^\infty\psi^*x\psi dx$$

why does this textbook divide by the integral of probability density ##\int \psi^*\psi dx##?

Screen Shot 2021-03-16 at 11.06.08 PM.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
docnet said:
a NMR text.

Which textbook?

docnet said:
why does this textbook divide by the integral of probability density ##\int \psi^*\psi dx##?

Because it is not assuming that ##\psi## is normalized. The formulas you are used to seeing are based on the assumption that ##\psi## is normalized, which is a typical assumption in QM textbooks; but that just means the integral in the denominator is ##1## so the textbooks often leave it out. A strictly correct formula keeps it in.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and docnet
PeterDonis said:
Which textbook?

University of Cambridge published lectures of NMR under Introduction to NMR on this website

Link: http://www-keeler.ch.cam.ac.uk/lectures/

PeterDonis said:
Because it is not assuming that ##\psi## is normalized. The formulas you are used to seeing are based on the assumption that ##\psi## is normalized, which is a typical assumption in QM textbooks; but that just means the integral in the denominator is ##1## so the textbooks often leave it out. A strictly correct formula keeps it in.

Ah, that makes so much sense. Thank you I am truly glad for to have your knowledge as a resource for studying. :bow:

edited for grammar
 
docnet said:
Thank you I am truly glad for to have your knowledge as a resource for studying. :bow:

You're welcome! Glad I could help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K