Question about transverse standing wave including violin string

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a violin string vibrating at a frequency of 335 Hz when unfingered, and the inquiry is about the frequency when the string is fingered halfway down. The context is within the subject area of wave mechanics, specifically focusing on standing waves and their properties in string instruments.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply the formula for frequency in relation to the length of the string, considering the string is fixed at both ends. There is discussion about the implications of fingering the string and how it affects the length and frequency. Participants question the value of n in the context of standing waves and the nature of nodes and antinodes.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, providing insights and corrections regarding the algebra involved. There is recognition of a mistake in the original poster's calculations, and some guidance has been offered to help clarify the relationship between string length and frequency. Multiple interpretations of the fingering concept are being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of a potential misunderstanding regarding the definition of fingering and its impact on the effective length of the string. The discussion also highlights the importance of correctly applying the wave frequency formulas in the context of fixed endpoints.

pinal08854
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I have a question on this problem
1. 10. A violin string vibrates at 335 Hz when unfingered. At what frequency will it vibrate if it is fingered one half of the way down from the end?

For this one I worked out that string is fixed at both ends because its in a violin so I am thinking of using f=n v/2L where L=1 lambda/2 and v= lambda f. So overall it comes out to be f= nf, so in this case the n would be 1, right so the answer would be the same...right?
I don't know if this is the right approach but this is what I am thinkin...any suggestions might help me figure out this problem..
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The 'fingered' reference refers to actually holding the string down at its midway point making the string half the length of the unfingered or open position. It is not a reference to plucking half way down the string as I believe you have taken it to be.
 
Yes, I agree with Kurdt .
Also note that at the point of fingering , there exists a node .
What is the value of n then ?
 
so that means the value of n would be 1/2, right? because it's fingered half way through the wave. Wouldn't n be a whole number..I really have no idea
 
The string becomes fixed at a new position (i.e. L/2) so find the frequency of the string with this length instead of the old.
 
so basically the new frequency is half of original one which would be 167.5 Hz, right? because if I substitute this in place of L I get f= n f/2 which comes out to be 335/2= 167.5...right? Am I making sense?
 
I think your algebra is a little out it should be double but I'll leave it to you to try and find your mistake. If you still have trouble don't hesitate to post again.
 
Yes, it should be double.
Can you physically "see" why the frequency increases ?
As suggested you have made some algebraic error .
_______________________________________________

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.
Albert Einstein
 
You guys are right...I made a stupid algebraic mistake and figured it out to be 670 Hz instead of 167.5 Hz. I plugged in L/2 in the wrong place...stupid substitution error...Thanks a lot for helping me, guys.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K