Question about work, energy and the work energy theorem.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a mass on a ramp transitioning to a rough surface and then to another ramp, exploring concepts of work, energy, and the work-energy theorem. The original poster seeks to determine how high the mass will ascend on the second ramp after encountering friction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to relate work done by friction to the change in gravitational potential energy. They question whether to consider the work done by gravity during the mass's movement on the ramps.

Discussion Status

Some participants affirm the original poster's approach while seeking clarification on the role of gravity in the work-energy context. There is an ongoing exploration of whether all work done is accounted for or if additional factors need consideration.

Contextual Notes

The problem lacks specific angles for the ramps and does not provide numerical values for the mass, height, or coefficients of friction, which may influence the discussion.

Ethan_Tab
Messages
57
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


So a mass m is placed on a ramp at a height given by h_1. This portion of the trip is frictionless. Then, at the bottom of the ramp the mass encounters a rough patch of levelled ground with a µk given my µ. This strip has a length of size "d" meters. After traveling across this surface, the mass encounters yet again, another frictionless ramp. The question wants to know how far up the second ramp the ball will get. Call this variable h_2. There were no ø given for either of the two ramps.

Homework Equations


ΔE=W
GPE=mgh
KE=½mv^2
W+KE_1+GPE_1=KE_2+GPE_2+E_loss (due to friction)
KE_1=0
KE_2=0 (when it reaches it max height on the second hill)

The Attempt at a Solution


If someone could confirm this or explain why this is incorrect it would be very helpful.

Im thinking,
Since W=F*D and I know the only force acting against the ball is that of friction (negative work), can I equate that to ΔGPE?

So; -µmgd=mgh_2-mgh_1
-µd+h_1=h_2

But now that I think about it, would there also be work done by the x component of gravity when the ball is rolling down and up the first and second hills? If anyone could clarify this it would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your solution looks correct to me.
Ethan_Tab said:
But now that I think about it, would there also be work done by the x component of gravity when the ball is rolling down and up the first and second hills?
Could you elaborate upon this? I am not entirely sure what you are confused about.
 
AlephNumbers said:
Your solution looks correct to me.

Could you elaborate upon this? I am not entirely sure what you are confused about.

Can I just assume all work done is that which the mass encountered when it slid across the rough patch of length "d" or do I have to count for the work done by gravity when the mass was on both ramps?
 
Ethan_Tab said:
-µmgd=mgh_2-mgh_1

It looks like you did account for it.

Gravity is a conservative force. The work done on the mass by the force of gravity is equal to the change in kinetic energy of the mass; W = ΔK
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ethan_Tab
AlephNumbers said:
It looks like you did account for it.

Gravity is a conservative force. The work done on the mass by the force of gravity is equal to the change in kinetic energy of the mass; W = ΔK

Oh! I see! Thanks for the help :smile:.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K