Question from simple lens diagram (camera)

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 3K views
ZedCar
Messages
353
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A simple camera has a converging lens of focal length 50.0 mm.

It is used to photograph a tree 3.00 m high.

The tree is 8.00 m away from the lens.

Calculate the distance v between the lens and the film, giving your answer in mm to three significant figures.


Homework Equations



1/f = 1/u + 1/v

The Attempt at a Solution



1/50 = 1/8000 + 1/(-v)
v = -50.3 mm

Is this correct? Thank you! :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why did you reason that the image distance was negative?
 
Hmmm, not sure why I done that actually...

Have corrected to:

1/f = 1/u + 1/v

1/50 = 1/8000 + 1/v

v = 50.3 mm
 
That looks right. The negative image distance you got before implies that the film needed to be outside the camera to capture the image.
 
Thanks Squeezebox!

When I want to calculate the linear magnification of the image, the following equation is used:

m = v/u

Do I use the same v and u values from above? (both in metres)

i.e.

0.0503 / 8 = 0.0063
 
ZedCar said:
Thanks Squeezebox!

When I want to calculate the linear magnification of the image, the following equation is used:

m = v/u

Do I use the same v and u values from above? (both in metres)

i.e.

0.0503 / 8 = 0.0063

Now you have the opposite problem. There's a negative sign in this one.

m= -v/u

The image gets flipped upside down. This happens with your eyes too; your brain flips the image back right side up.
 
Ah, so it'd be

-0.0503 / 8 = -0.0063

So is the height of the tree, stated in the question as being 3.00 m, not required to obtain the linear magnification?