Question ODE non-homogeneous Linear

  • Thread starter Thread starter Another
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linear Ode
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
Another
Messages
104
Reaction score
5
Mod note: Member warned that the homework template is NOT optional
find yp (particular integral)

(D2 + 4D + 5) y = 2 e-2xcos(x)

((D+2)(D+2)+1) y = 2 e-2xcos(x)

yp = [1/((D+2)2 + 1)] ⋅ 2e-2xcos(x)

yp = e(-3)x ∫ ∫ e-(-3)x⋅2e-2xcos(x)dxdx

yp = e(-3)x ∫ ∫ e3x ⋅ 2e-2xcos(x)dxdx

yp = e(-3)x ∫ (exsin(x)+excos(x))dx

yp = e(-3)x[-½ excos(x) + ½exsin(x) + ½exsin(x) + ½excos(x)]

yp = e(-3)x ⋅ ex sin(x)

yp = e(-2)x sin(x) ; this is my answer

But correct answer is x e(-2)x sin(x)

Why are there variables x ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Another said:
find yp (particular integral)

(D2 + 4D + 5) y = 2 e-2xcos(x)

((D+2)(D+2)+1) y = 2 e-2xcos(x)

yp = [1/((D+2)2 + 1)] ⋅ 2e-2xcos(x)

yp = e(-3)x ∫ ∫ e-(-3)x⋅2e-2xcos(x)dxdx

yp = e(-3)x ∫ ∫ e3x ⋅ 2e-2xcos(x)dxdx

yp = e(-3)x ∫ (exsin(x)+excos(x))dx

yp = e(-3)x[-½ excos(x) + ½exsin(x) + ½exsin(x) + ½excos(x)]

yp = e(-3)x ⋅ ex sin(x)

yp = e(-2)x sin(x) ; this is my answer

But correct answer is x e(-2)x sin(x)

Why are there variables x ?

You have not found a particular solution; you have found one of the two homogeneous solutions (that is, solutions which solve the DE with 0 on the right).

In general, I am extremely suspicious of your approach, because I do not trust expressions like ##[(D+2)^2+1]^{-1} f(x)##. You seem to be attempting to use Heaviside's Operational Calculus, but without sticking to the rules.

It would be better to use either
(1) Laplace transforms --- basically, a modern version of Heavisides's operational methods; or
(2) The method of undetermined coefficients.
Personally, I prefer (1), and it leads to exactly the particular solution ##x e^{-2x} \sin x## that somebody has told you is correct.

I am not sure how to answer your question about "why the x?". All I can say is that the two homogenous solutions ##y_1(x) = e^{-2x} \cos x## and ##y_2(x) = e^{-2x} \sin x## do not work, so trying something like ##c_1(x) y_1(x) + c_2(x) y_2(x)## is the obvious next step. If you look to make ##c_1(x)## and ##c_2(x)## as simple as possible, you would try linear functions ##c_i(x) = a_i + b_i x##, and then try to determine the ##a_i## and ##b_i##. That is more-or-less method (2) that I mentioned above. See, eg., https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Method_of_undetermined_coefficients .
 
Last edited by a moderator: