- #1
Amad27
- 412
- 1
Hi,
Suppose you want to prove [itex]|x - a||x + a| < \epsilon[/itex]
You know
[itex]|x - a| < (2|a| + 1)[/itex]
You need to prove
[itex]|x + a| < \frac{\epsilon}{2|a| + 1}[/itex]
So that
[itex]|x - a||x + a| < \epsilon[/itex]
Why does Michael Spivak do this:
He says you have to prove --> [itex]|x + a| < min(1, \frac{\epsilon}{2|a| + 1})[/itex] in order to finally prove, [itex]|x + a||x - a| < \epsilon[/itex]
Why do we need the "min" function there?
Amad27 - The closing itex tag starts with /, not \. I fixed them all for you. - Mark44
Thanks!
Suppose you want to prove [itex]|x - a||x + a| < \epsilon[/itex]
You know
[itex]|x - a| < (2|a| + 1)[/itex]
You need to prove
[itex]|x + a| < \frac{\epsilon}{2|a| + 1}[/itex]
So that
[itex]|x - a||x + a| < \epsilon[/itex]
Why does Michael Spivak do this:
He says you have to prove --> [itex]|x + a| < min(1, \frac{\epsilon}{2|a| + 1})[/itex] in order to finally prove, [itex]|x + a||x - a| < \epsilon[/itex]
Why do we need the "min" function there?
Amad27 - The closing itex tag starts with /, not \. I fixed them all for you. - Mark44
Thanks!
Last edited by a moderator: