Question on gravitational waves and redshift in BH coalesce

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the observation of gravitational waves from binary black hole mergers as detailed in the paper "Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger" by B.P. Abbott et al. The user, Javier, questions why gravitational waves do not exhibit redshift effects similar to electromagnetic waves as black holes coalesce. The response clarifies that the merging process is dynamic, producing gravitational waves that propagate outward, and that these waves are indeed subject to redshift, which is accounted for in LIGO's calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational waves and their detection methods, specifically LIGO.
  • Familiarity with black hole physics and the dynamics of black hole mergers.
  • Knowledge of redshift and its implications in astrophysics.
  • Basic grasp of spacetime curvature and its effects on wave propagation.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of gravitational wave detection using LIGO.
  • Study the dynamics of black hole mergers and their impact on spacetime.
  • Explore the concept of redshift in both electromagnetic and gravitational waves.
  • Examine the mathematical models used in gravitational wave astronomy.
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and students interested in gravitational wave research, black hole dynamics, and the implications of redshift in wave propagation.

Javier Zapater
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Dear Sirs

My question relates to the recent observation of gravitational waves by LIGO.
The paper PRL 116 "Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger -B.P Abbott et al"" depicts the chirp signal of the wave detected, where it is seen how both frequency and amplitude increase till coming to an end, where oscillations stop, indicating that both BHs coalesce into single one.

Question: why do we see that end in the gravitational wave signal? in short, why we see the coalesce? I mean, I would have expected (surely wrong) that we, as external observers should have "seen"/detected the two BH, meanwhile approaching both event horizons to the final merge, suffering an increasing redhsift during the collapse that would have prevented us from detecting that one BH crossed the event horizon of the companion, and viceversa. Similar effect as if we, meanwhile remaining in orbit around a BH, see an object falling into the BH. We will see the light emitted by the object gradually and infinitely redshifted meanwhile approaching the event horizon.

Should not the gravitational waves suffer from the same collapse redshift observed as in the electromagnetic waves?

Where is my reasoning wrong?Thanks for your help.

javier
 
Space news on Phys.org
Javier Zapater said:
Where is my reasoning wrong?

You are imagining one BH as a small test object falling into the other BH. That's not correct. This is a highly dynamic situation, and it doesn't work the same as a small test object falling into a static BH.

The "coalescence" of the two BHs is not simply a merging of their horizons. Again, it's a highly dynamic process that produces strong fluctuations in spacetime curvature. Most of those fluctuations are outside the combined horizon of the two BHs, so they propagate outward; they are in fact the gravitational waves that we detect. (Some fluctuations are trapped inside the horizon, but of course we don't detect those.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Javier Zapater
Thanks PeterDonis.

One more question. Shall the fluctuations propagating through the space-time be subject to the same redshift expansion as electromagnetic waves?

I mean λ of GW detected= λ of GW emited * (1+z)

Is it correct?

Thanks
javier
 
Javier Zapater said:
Shall the fluctuations propagating through the space-time be subject to the same redshift expansion as electromagnetic waves?

They should be, yes. I believe that is taken into account in the calculations that were done for LIGO.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Javier Zapater
Thanks a lot.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
760
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K