Question on logarithmic differentiation and absolute value

Click For Summary
In logarithmic differentiation of the function y = x^5(3x-1)^3, the absolute value is applied to each term separately, leading to |y| = |x|^5 * |3x-1|^3, which ensures that the logarithm is defined for all x values. This step is crucial because logarithms are only defined for positive values, and without using absolute values, the differentiation could yield incorrect results for negative inputs. The rule |a * b| = |a| * |b| justifies this approach, allowing for the differentiation process to remain valid. Some argue that using the product rule directly could simplify the differentiation, but logarithmic differentiation is preferred for its effectiveness in handling products of functions. Understanding the necessity of absolute values in this context is key to correctly applying logarithmic differentiation.
Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44
For the problem of differentiating ##y = x^5(3x-1)^3## using logarithmic differentiation, the solution provides the first step as rewriting the functions as ##\left |y \right | = \left | x \right |^5 \cdot \left | 3x-1 \right |^3##. This confuses me. First, how are we, mathematically, able to do this? How can we just select which terms inside of the function to take the absolute value of? Why wouldn't it be ##\left |y \right | = \left | x^5(3x-1)^3 \right |##? I would love for someone to explain this to me. Second of all, why is this an essential step in logarithmic differentiation? Why can't we just take the natural log of ##y = x^5(3x-1)^3## and be done with it?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
##|a## x ##b|=|a|## x ##|b|##. This is a rule. Additonally, logarithms are only defined for positive values. It is essential to put a modulus because ##x## can take any value and the result can be negative. I also think that an easier way to solve this would be to simply use the product rule for differentiation.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K