Question on relationship between undergrad school and gradaute school in the UK

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the decision-making process for choosing an undergraduate institution for theoretical physics, specifically comparing University College London (UCL) and Durham University. Participants explore the implications of their choices on future research opportunities, particularly in string theory, and share personal experiences regarding university teaching quality and self-directed learning.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Martin expresses concern that choosing UCL, which focuses on astronomy and experimental physics, might hinder his chances of pursuing a PhD in string theory compared to choosing Durham, where string theory research is conducted.
  • One participant suggests that initial specialization interests often change, advising Martin to prioritize the quality of teaching over specific research areas at the undergraduate level.
  • Another participant reflects on their experience at Warwick, noting that despite its high ranking, the teaching quality was not satisfactory, emphasizing the importance of self-directed learning in university education.
  • Concerns are raised about the fast-paced nature of lectures at Warwick and Imperial College, suggesting that students may need to independently learn much of the material.
  • A participant encourages not to be deterred by negative comments about Warwick, reiterating that self-teaching is a common aspect of university education regardless of the institution chosen.
  • Martin mentions he is also considering Imperial and Warwick, seeking insights from others about their experiences at UCL or Durham.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best choice between UCL and Durham, with differing opinions on the importance of research focus versus teaching quality. The discussion reflects multiple competing views on how undergraduate choices may impact future academic opportunities.

Contextual Notes

Participants express various assumptions about the nature of university education, the role of self-directed learning, and the potential for changing academic interests over time. There is no resolution on the impact of specific university research areas on future PhD applications.

redpen
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi!

I am choosing between Theoretical physics at UCL (University College of London) and Durham University. In the future I am hoping to do research in theoretical physics such as string theory.

Research at UCL is mostly focused on astronomy and experimental physics while at Durham it is string theory and theoretical physics.

If I choose UCL (ie an institution where no string theory research is conducted) will my chances of doing a PhD on string theory at another uni decrease? Will they increase if I choose Durham (where string theory research is conducted)?

Thanks,
Martin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

First of all let me just say that usually what think you will specialise in before arriving at university usually isn't what you end up doing! Before I came to warwick I wanted to do an astrophysics PhD... Now I'm in my final year with a PhD in Solid state quantum information processing at Oxford scheduled in October. So in your case I wouldn't worry about which institution carries out research in string theory. I would just focus on going to a university with good quality teaching. And league rankings aren't always a good indication of this. Warwick was 2nd when I applied in 2002 for physics but their teaching isn't all that good. You'll end up teaching your self most things.

Your choice may change throughout your undergrad studies and even if they don't you won't be at a huge disadvantage. When you apply for PhDs you'll most ikely have to research into string theory yourself when writing your research proposal. That was certainly the case for me.. no one at warwick knows anything about quantum information processing.
 
Baggio said:
Hi,
Warwick was 2nd when I applied in 2002 for physics but their teaching isn't all that good.

It's third this year, I'm debating whether to goto Wariwick or Liverpool, but from what you've said, it's put me off warwick :frown:
 
Sorry the point I was trying to get across though is that at university level you have to be very self dependent.. I have only been to warwick but their teaching may be better than other universities. For me personally I found my self learning a lot of the stuff they teach on my own because lectures are very fast paced with lots of material to cover. I visited Imperial college in january and sat in on one of their lectures.. it's very similar to warwick in that sense. So this may just be something that we have to deal with. Plus I'm currently in the library studying relativistic QM at the moment and it's driving me nuts so my opinion may be biased lol..

That said Warwick has one of the best campuses in the country... and their en suite accomodation is fantastic so for an undergrad you sure would enjoy living there.
 
Hootenanny said:
It's third this year, I'm debating whether to goto Wariwick or Liverpool, but from what you've said, it's put me off warwick :frown:

Don`t let what Baggio said put you off. No matter what uni you decied to go to, most of what you learn is self taught. The lectures talk about a subject and give you the main/ important pionts but you have got to go away and read around the subject to get a full understanding if you don`t you're going to struggle.
 
I'm chosing between UCL and Durham for theoretical physics (see above), and I'm waiting for replies from Imperial and Warwick. Does anyone have any experiences with physics at UCL or Durham?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K