warenzeichen
- 20
- 0
I am curious of the reason why the V=O stretching here has a lower frequency than that in VO(acac)2. Is it related to resonance? I am not sure.
The discussion revolves around the frequency of the V=O stretching vibration in VO(acac)-piperidine compared to VO(acac)2. Participants explore potential reasons for the observed frequency difference, including resonance effects and bonding considerations.
Participants generally agree on the observed frequency shift but express differing views on the underlying reasons, particularly regarding resonance and bonding structures. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact calculations and implications of these observations.
Some participants mention uncertainties about the experimental versus literature values for the stretching frequency, as well as the complexity of IR spectroscopy in the context of metal complexes.
warenzeichen said:about 40 cm^-1
I think there should be four bonds except the V=O ? also, one acac is substituted by piperidine, isn't it?
Hello there,warenzeichen said:about 40 cm^-1
the V=O stretching vibration for VO(acac)2 at 995cm^-1 and for VO(acac)-piperidine it is at 957cm^-1
I think there should be four bonds except the V=O ? also, one acac is substituted by piperidine, isn't it?
Thanks.