Question on VO(acac)-piperidine

  • Thread starter Thread starter warenzeichen
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the differences in V=O stretching frequencies between VO(acac)2 and VO(acac)-piperidine. The lower frequency observed in the latter (957 cm^-1) compared to VO(acac)2 (995 cm^-1) is attributed to resonance effects. When piperidine is involved, it can form a bond with vanadium, resulting in a more stable nitrogen cation compared to the carbocation formed when an oxygen bonds in VO(acac)2. This stability leads to a weaker V=O bond in the piperidine complex, thus lowering the stretching frequency. The participants also discuss the bonding structure, noting that in VO(acac)2, there are effectively four bonds due to resonance between the acetylacetonate ligands. Additionally, there is a request for clarification on whether the reported stretching frequency is experimental or from literature.
warenzeichen
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I am curious of the reason why the V=O stretching here has a lower frequency than that in VO(acac)2. Is it related to resonance? I am not sure.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Yeah, you can explain it in terms of resonance.

Basically (ignoring the two existing bonds to vanadium) you have V=O <--> -V-O- where in the latter case, some ligand forms an additional bond to the vanadium atom, creating a cation somewhere else.

In the case of VO(acac)2, an oxygen forms an additional bond, leaving a cation on the carbon it is bonded to. With piperedine, the nitrogen can form a second bond to vanadium, with its lone pair, making the nitrogen a cation.

The nitrogen cation is more stable than the carbocation, so the V-O- resonance form is more stable with piperidine, so the V=O double-bond is weaker, so the V=O stretch has a lower frequency.

(Updated: I did a calculation, it's a pretty small shift, about 20 cm-1? http://i38.tinypic.com/25z5pwg.gif")
 
Last edited by a moderator:
about 40 cm^-1

the V=O stretching vibration for VO(acac)2 at 995cm^-1 and for VO(acac)-piperidine it is at 957cm^-1

I think there should be four bonds except the V=O ? also, one acac is substituted by piperidine, isn't it?

Thanks.
 
warenzeichen said:
about 40 cm^-1

Well, close enough - well within the margin of error. :)

I think there should be four bonds except the V=O ? also, one acac is substituted by piperidine, isn't it?

Well, with VO(acac)2 you'll have four oxygens liganding, but with two bonds which you could view as resonating between the two acetylacetonate oxygen atoms. So, 'half' a bond to each oxygen would really be a better way of thinking of it. (and in the zwitterion-resonance form, you'd have two full bonds to one acac, and a carbocation on the same acac) With VO(acac) you'd replace one acetylacetonate with the piperidine (CH2)5N-.
 
Thanks for your answer.
and finally could you tell me how to calculate it ? It seems that I can not calculate it based on the information I knew in the IR( I don't learn the IR on metal in details... But it looks pretty similar to IR but in more complex way...)
 
warenzeichen said:
about 40 cm^-1

the V=O stretching vibration for VO(acac)2 at 995cm^-1 and for VO(acac)-piperidine it is at 957cm^-1

I think there should be four bonds except the V=O ? also, one acac is substituted by piperidine, isn't it?

Thanks.
Hello there,

The stretching frequency of v(V=O) band is 957 cm^(-1), could you please tell me if it is your experimental value or literature value?

Thanks
 
Thread 'How to make Sodium Chlorate by Electrolysis of salt water?'
I have a power supply for electrolysis of salt water brine, variable 3v to 6v up to 30 amps. Cathode is stainless steel, anode is carbon rods. Carbon rod surface area 42" sq. the Stainless steel cathode should be 21" sq. Salt is pure 100% salt dissolved into distilled water. I have been making saturated salt wrong. Today I learn saturated salt is, dissolve pure salt into 150°f water cool to 100°f pour into the 2 gallon brine tank. I find conflicting information about brine tank...
Engineers slash iridium use in electrolyzer catalyst by 80%, boosting path to affordable green hydrogen https://news.rice.edu/news/2025/engineers-slash-iridium-use-electrolyzer-catalyst-80-boosting-path-affordable-green Ruthenium is also fairly expensive (a year ago it was about $490/ troy oz, but has nearly doubled in price over the past year, now about $910/ troy oz). I tracks prices of Pt, Pd, Ru, Ir and Ru. Of the 5 metals, rhodium (Rh) is the most expensive. A year ago, Rh and Ir...
Back
Top