Question on VO(acac)-piperidine

  • Thread starter Thread starter warenzeichen
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the frequency of the V=O stretching vibration in VO(acac)-piperidine compared to VO(acac)2. Participants explore potential reasons for the observed frequency difference, including resonance effects and bonding considerations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the lower frequency of the V=O stretching in VO(acac)-piperidine may be related to resonance effects.
  • One participant explains that the resonance forms involve V=O and V-O- structures, where the latter allows for additional bonding interactions with ligands like piperidine.
  • Another participant notes the specific stretching frequencies: 995 cm^-1 for VO(acac)2 and 957 cm^-1 for VO(acac)-piperidine, indicating a shift of about 40 cm^-1.
  • There is a discussion about the bonding structure, with some participants mentioning that there should be four bonds in total, excluding the V=O bond, and that one acac ligand is substituted by piperidine.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about how to calculate the frequency shift based on IR data, indicating a lack of detailed knowledge on IR spectroscopy related to metal complexes.
  • Clarifications are made regarding the bonding in VO(acac)2, suggesting that the bonds can be viewed as resonating between the two acetylacetonate oxygen atoms.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the observed frequency shift but express differing views on the underlying reasons, particularly regarding resonance and bonding structures. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact calculations and implications of these observations.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention uncertainties about the experimental versus literature values for the stretching frequency, as well as the complexity of IR spectroscopy in the context of metal complexes.

warenzeichen
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I am curious of the reason why the V=O stretching here has a lower frequency than that in VO(acac)2. Is it related to resonance? I am not sure.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Yeah, you can explain it in terms of resonance.

Basically (ignoring the two existing bonds to vanadium) you have V=O <--> -V-O- where in the latter case, some ligand forms an additional bond to the vanadium atom, creating a cation somewhere else.

In the case of VO(acac)2, an oxygen forms an additional bond, leaving a cation on the carbon it is bonded to. With piperedine, the nitrogen can form a second bond to vanadium, with its lone pair, making the nitrogen a cation.

The nitrogen cation is more stable than the carbocation, so the V-O- resonance form is more stable with piperidine, so the V=O double-bond is weaker, so the V=O stretch has a lower frequency.

(Updated: I did a calculation, it's a pretty small shift, about 20 cm-1? http://i38.tinypic.com/25z5pwg.gif")
 
Last edited by a moderator:
about 40 cm^-1

the V=O stretching vibration for VO(acac)2 at 995cm^-1 and for VO(acac)-piperidine it is at 957cm^-1

I think there should be four bonds except the V=O ? also, one acac is substituted by piperidine, isn't it?

Thanks.
 
warenzeichen said:
about 40 cm^-1

Well, close enough - well within the margin of error. :)

I think there should be four bonds except the V=O ? also, one acac is substituted by piperidine, isn't it?

Well, with VO(acac)2 you'll have four oxygens liganding, but with two bonds which you could view as resonating between the two acetylacetonate oxygen atoms. So, 'half' a bond to each oxygen would really be a better way of thinking of it. (and in the zwitterion-resonance form, you'd have two full bonds to one acac, and a carbocation on the same acac) With VO(acac) you'd replace one acetylacetonate with the piperidine (CH2)5N-.
 
Thanks for your answer.
and finally could you tell me how to calculate it ? It seems that I can not calculate it based on the information I knew in the IR( I don't learn the IR on metal in details... But it looks pretty similar to IR but in more complex way...)
 
warenzeichen said:
about 40 cm^-1

the V=O stretching vibration for VO(acac)2 at 995cm^-1 and for VO(acac)-piperidine it is at 957cm^-1

I think there should be four bonds except the V=O ? also, one acac is substituted by piperidine, isn't it?

Thanks.
Hello there,

The stretching frequency of v(V=O) band is 957 cm^(-1), could you please tell me if it is your experimental value or literature value?

Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
971
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K