Question over dimensions, something that's been bothering me

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter KartikAddanki
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimensions
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between dimensions in string theory, specifically the transition from 11 dimensions in M-Theory to 10 dimensions in established string theories. It highlights that while string theory can theoretically be formulated in any number of dimensions, critical stability is achieved only in 10 dimensions. The conversation also notes that non-critical string theories exist but are generally unstable and less favored for force-unification purposes. Key references include Wikipedia articles on string theory and non-critical string theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of string theory fundamentals
  • Familiarity with M-Theory and its implications
  • Knowledge of critical vs. non-critical string theories
  • Basic grasp of dimensional analysis in theoretical physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "M-Theory and its implications for string theory"
  • Explore "Critical and non-critical string theories" in detail
  • Study "Supersymmetry in string theory" and its significance
  • Read "Theoretical frameworks for force-unification in physics"
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, students of advanced physics, and anyone interested in the complexities of string theory and its dimensional frameworks.

KartikAddanki
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Maybe someone could inform me a little on what I'm talking about, because, honestly, I have no idea. If 11 dimensions=1 string theory -> 10 dimensions=5 string theories, is it possible to derive(right word? maybe) more string theories using lesser dimensions? Thanks. Even a yes or no answer would help, with a link to the appropriate wikipedia article. Or if you had time I'd be more than happy to read over whatever you have to say.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A while back there were five string theories in ten dimensions that were all stable in that they didn't predict infinities, then Witten among others noticed that you could have one 11 dimensional theory in which the other five were like different ways of looking at the same thing (=M thory). Now however M Theory is not one theory but countless theories - leading to otherwise smart people believing that there are countless universes despite the fact we don't have a single bit of evidence for anything other than the one universe we observe.

Of course there are many other theories using less dimensions, in fact those are what string theories came from, but there are all kinds of issues with them and if you're interested you really need to get yourself one of the good books on the subject.
 
If you're looking for stuff on wikipedia I suggest

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_Theory#Number_of_dimensions
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-critical_string_theory

Basically the idea as I understand it is this:

You can formulate string theory in any number of dimensions you like.

However, the background space where the strings live must be "critical", or else the theory is unstable. With supersymmetric strings, the only way anyone knows to do this is if the space is 10-dimensional.

The M-Theory people have a trick that let's them bump that up to 11 dimensions while keeping the strings critical. But nobody knows how to turn it down to lower than 10 dimensions. If anyone knew of such a trick then surely they would use it, because the more dimensions you have past 4 the more dimensions you have to explain away.

You can again just go ahead and create "non-critical" string models with fewer dimensions, and sometimes these models have mathematical uses. But because of the instability you cannot use these models for a force-unification "theory of everything", which is what people would really like to use string theory for, so people are not as interested in the non-critical string theories.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
114K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K