Question regarding Conservation of Energy

In summary, the grappling hook can reach a maximum height of 40.786 meters if it is rotating at a rate of three revolutions per second.
  • #1
xxdrossxx
8
0
Hello, I'm currently in a high school physics course, and I'm having trouble with a question in a "Work and Energy" chapter, which has focused on conservation of energy. I'm hoping that someone here can help me out.

A grappling hook, attached to a 1.5-m rope, is whirled in a circle that lies in the vertical plane. The lowest point on this circle is at ground level. The hook is whirled at a constant rate of three revolutions per second. In the absence of air resistance, to what maximum height can the hook be cast?

Thanks so much for any help that you can give. :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
As per the forum rules, you need to show some work on your own or what you think you might need to do.
 
  • #3
Woops, I'm sorry about that. Okay.

In earlier problems that I've seen like this, they've involved an object spinning in a circle on the vertical plane...but in those cases, the object just barely makes it over the top of the circle, so that the kinetic energy at the top of the circle is equal to 0. In the case of those problems, I would set potential energy at the top equal to the kinetic energy at the bottom. In other words, mgh = 0.5mv^2 and therefore gh = 0.5v^2.

This problem is different though, I think. It's saying that the hook is whirled at a "constant rate of three revolutions per second", which is equal to a velocity of 28.274 m/s (three revolutions = 3 * pi * 3.0 m = 28.274). However, if there's a constant velocity, then the hook is obviously moving completely around the circle...so wouldn't the "max height that the hook can be cast" simply be 3 meters, or the height at the top of the circle?

I think that I'm misunderstanding the wording of this question.

Thanks for any help that you can give.
 
  • #4
xxdrossxx said:
Woops, I'm sorry about that. Okay.
In earlier problems that I've seen like this, they've involved an object spinning in a circle on the vertical plane...but in those cases, the object just barely makes it over the top of the circle, so that the kinetic energy at the top of the circle is equal to 0. In the case of those problems, I would set potential energy at the top equal to the kinetic energy at the bottom. In other words, mgh = 0.5mv^2 and therefore gh = 0.5v^2.
This problem is different though, I think. It's saying that the hook is whirled at a "constant rate of three revolutions per second", which is equal to a velocity of 28.274 m/s (three revolutions = 3 * pi * 3.0 m = 28.274). However, if there's a constant velocity, then the hook is obviously moving completely around the circle...so wouldn't the "max height that the hook can be cast" simply be 3 meters, or the height at the top of the circle?
I think that I'm misunderstanding the wording of this question.
Thanks for any help that you can give.
Yea, it seems as if you are misunderstanding it. Think of how you'd throw a grappling hook. You'd twirl it around in your hand, and then release it. This question is asking, if you twirl the hook at a rate of three revolutions per second, what is the maximum height that the hook can reach?
Combine that with the fact that if you release the rope, [tex]a_{rad}[/tex] immediatly becomes zero, and the problem shouldn't give you any more difficulties.
 
  • #5
johnw188 said:
Yea, it seems as if you are misunderstanding it. Think of how you'd throw a grappling hook. You'd twirl it around in your hand, and then release it. This question is asking, if you twirl the hook at a rate of three revolutions per second, what is the maximum height that the hook can reach?
Combine that with the fact that if you release the rope, [tex]a_{rad}[/tex] immediatly becomes zero, and the problem shouldn't give you any more difficulties.
Oh, of course! It makes perfect sense to me now. So I'd just do the following:

0.5 (28.274 m/s)^2 = (9.8 m/s^2) * h
h = 40.786 meters

Does that look correct?
 
  • #6
xxdrossxx said:
Oh, of course! It makes perfect sense to me now. So I'd just do the following:
0.5 (28.274 m/s)^2 = (9.8 m/s^2) * h
h = 40.786 meters
Does that look correct?

Couple of tips in general for physics.

1) Write everything out symbolically until the very last step, it keeps things easier to read.

[tex]\frac{1}{2} m v_0^2 = mgh[/tex]
[tex]h = \frac{\frac{1}{2} m v_0^2}{mg}[/tex]

The one thing you forgot is that you aren't releasing from ground level; you're releasing from when the hook is horizontal to you, so that your tangential velocity is pointing straight up to get the maximum height. As you know the rope is 1.5 m long, you have to add 1.5 m to your final height calculation.

2) Be careful of your significant figures. I didn't see what they gave you in the problem, but I doubt it was 5 for all the variables.
 

1. What is the law of conservation of energy?

The law of conservation of energy states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, but can only be transformed from one form to another. This means that the total amount of energy in a closed system remains constant over time.

2. How does the law of conservation of energy apply to everyday life?

The law of conservation of energy applies to everyday life in many ways, such as in the operation of machines and vehicles, the production of electricity, and even in our own bodies. For example, when we drive a car, the chemical energy from gasoline is converted into kinetic energy to move the car.

3. Can energy be lost or wasted?

No, according to the law of conservation of energy, energy cannot be lost or wasted. It can only be transformed into a different form. However, some forms of energy may not be usable or easily accessible, making them seem "lost" or "wasted" in practical terms.

4. Can the law of conservation of energy be violated?

No, the law of conservation of energy is a fundamental principle of physics and has been observed to hold true in all known cases. If the law were to be violated, it would require a fundamental change in our understanding of the universe.

5. How does the law of conservation of energy relate to other laws of thermodynamics?

The law of conservation of energy is the first law of thermodynamics, which states that energy cannot be created or destroyed. It is closely related to the other two laws of thermodynamics, which deal with the transfer of energy and the direction of energy flow. Together, these laws help us understand the behavior of energy in physical systems.

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
247
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
55
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top