Question regarding Friedmann equation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Friedmann equation and the implications of a solution where H = H0 = 0, exploring whether this represents a valid static universe or a spurious result of the equation's derivation. Participants examine the conditions under which this solution might hold and the mathematical implications of setting H and H0 to zero.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Buzz suggests that H = H0 = 0 implies a static universe, questioning whether this solution is spurious and how it arises from the derivation of the Friedmann equation.
  • Peter challenges the validity of H = H0 = 0, stating that if H0 = 0, the left-hand side of the equation becomes undefined.
  • Chris argues that H can only be zero if the Ωs are also zero, implying that the solution is not valid independently of these parameters.
  • Buzz acknowledges that while H can be zero with non-zero H0 under certain conditions, the specific case of H = H0 = 0 does not correspond to a valid configuration of a GR universe.
  • Another participant notes that if H is zero, the critical density must also be zero, leading to a Minkowski space scenario.
  • Buzz reflects on the potential for misunderstanding due to the mathematical forms of the equation, indicating that his earlier thoughts may have been influenced by misinterpretations.
  • Chalnth emphasizes the dangers of division by zero, suggesting that it leads to nonsensical conclusions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the validity of the solution H = H0 = 0, with some arguing it is spurious while others challenge the implications of setting H and H0 to zero. The discussion remains unresolved as multiple competing views are presented.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the values of the scale factor a and the various Ωs, as well as the implications of division by zero in the context of the Friedmann equation.

Buzz Bloom
Gold Member
Messages
2,517
Reaction score
465
It has occurred to me that the Friedmann equation

Friedmann.png

allows for a solution
H = H0 = 0 .
This seems to say that independently of the value of the scale factor a, and the various Ωs, a static universe is possible. I am guessing that this solution is spurious and is a side effect of the derivation of the equation.

I am curious about how the derivation introduced this spurious solution of the cosmological form of the GR equations, and would much appreciate someone posting an explanation.

Regards,
Buzz
 
Space news on Phys.org
Buzz Bloom said:
allows for a solution
H = H0 = 0 .

What makes you think that? You do realize that, if ##H_0 = 0##, the LHS is undefined, right?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Buzz Bloom
how js H=0 a solution inependently of the value of a? Only if the Omegas are zero this can be true...
 
Hi Chris:

Thanks for your post.

If H0 = 0, then H = 0 no matter what values a or the Ωs have. I understand that H can also be zero with H0 not zero for some combinations of value for a and the Ωs. Such a solution would correspond to a mathematically possible configuration of a GR universe, but H = H0 = 0 does not.

Regards,
Buzz
 
PeterDonis said:
if H0=0, the LHS is undefined
Hi Peter:

Got it. Thank you. I have also seen the equation somewhere in the form
H = H0 √ . . .
This form, together with another of my occasional senior moments, are the sources of the spurious solution.

Regards,
Buzz
 
If H is zero the critical density is zero and so there is nothing in the universe. You recover Minkowski space.
 
Buzz Bloom said:
Hi Chris:
If H0 = 0, then H = 0 no matter what values a or the Ωs have. I understand that H can also be zero with H0 not zero for some combinations of value for a and the Ωs. Such a solution would correspond to a mathematically possible configuration of a GR universe, but H = H0 = 0 does not.

Well a's are not constant. In some point they can give an overall zero result and it's when the H=0 (acceleration halts for a moment).
The thing then is that if you want it to be always zero indepent of the value of a, the omegas to be zero. As for example the only way for:
ax^2+ bx+c =0 (always 0 independently of the value of x) would need a=b=c=0.
 
Orodruin said:
If H is zero the critical density is zero

More precisely, if H is zero at all times then the critical density is zero.
 
Buzz Bloom said:
It has occurred to me that the Friedmann equation

View attachment 94379
allows for a solution
H = H0 = 0 .
This seems to say that independently of the value of the scale factor a, and the various Ωs, a static universe is possible. I am guessing that this solution is spurious and is a side effect of the derivation of the equation.

I am curious about how the derivation introduced this spurious solution of the cosmological form of the GR equations, and would much appreciate someone posting an explanation.

Regards,
Buzz
If you permit this kind of division by zero, you can prove 1 = 2. All you've shown is that if you divide by zero, you can prove anything.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Buzz Bloom
  • #10
If you permit this kind of division by zero, you can prove 1 = 2. All you've shown is that if you divide by zero, you can prove anything.
Hi Chalnth:

Sorry I wasn't clearer in my post #5.

What you said above is what I meant by "another of my occasional senior moments".

Regards,
Buzz
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
8K