Question Regarding Purchasing an Algebra Book

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the decision between purchasing Herstein's "Topics in Algebra" and Pinter's "A Book of Abstract Algebra" for self-study in abstract algebra. Concerns about Herstein's book include its lack of insights and the nature of its problems, while Pinter's book is criticized for potentially not being challenging enough. Other mentioned texts include Serge Lang's "Undergraduate Algebra," Hungerford's "Abstract Algebra: An Introduction," and Artin's "Algebra." Ultimately, the participant seeks a book that fosters a deep understanding of abstract algebra as they continue their studies.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with basic abstract algebra concepts
  • Understanding of mathematical problem-solving techniques
  • Ability to compare and evaluate academic texts
  • Experience with self-directed learning in mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the differences between Herstein's "Topics in Algebra" and Pinter's "A Book of Abstract Algebra"
  • Explore reviews and comparisons of Serge Lang's "Undergraduate Algebra"
  • Investigate Hungerford's "Abstract Algebra: An Introduction" for its pedagogical approach
  • Examine Artin's "Algebra" for its advanced topics and suitability for self-study
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics undergraduates, self-learners in abstract algebra, and educators seeking to recommend suitable algebra texts.

mr.tea
Messages
101
Reaction score
12
Hi,

I am a math undergraduate major and just finished my first abstract algebra course. Unfortunately, we used the lecturer's notes which are quite dry, without motivation, and it really felt bad. I am really interested in abstract algebra, and thus has decided to re-learn it over the summer. After a long research over the internet, I have seen that both Herstein's topics and Pinter's book are well regarded and highly recommended.

But now I have some difficulties to decide which one I should purchase.

My concerns about Herstein's: I have read that it (a) does not give insights on the subjects(which sounds weird - how can it become a classic if it is not that good?) and (b) as he writes in the preface that some of the problem are not meant to be solved but rather just to tackle, which sounds a bit odd.

My concerns about Pinter's: in the MAA review, they say that the problems are not challenging, and I am not sure if it is at the same level as Herstein's.

My purpose is to continue with abstract algebra. So this course will not be my last one, and therefore I want to really understand what is going on.

I checked them both at the library, and both are wonderful books(and also D&F). I also checked Artin's, Jacobson's, Van Der Waerden but didn't like them very much.

I will be grateful for any advice and/or recommendations.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you are studying on your own, I wouldn't be too concerned about a book not being tough enough (at the same level as Herstein's). If it's easy, you can read through it fast and all is well. If it's too tough, you may either get stalled or get confused without help. If you checked them from the library, compare them both on the same subject, preferably one that you already understand, and see if you like how they describe it.
 
Any thoughts about Serge Lang's text ?
 
FactChecker said:
If you are studying on your own, I wouldn't be too concerned about a book not being tough enough (at the same level as Herstein's). If it's easy, you can read through it fast and all is well. If it's too tough, you may either get stalled or get confused without help. If you checked them from the library, compare them both on the same subject, preferably one that you already understand, and see if you like how they describe it.

Thank you for the answer. As I wrote, I already look at them both and loved them both, unfortunately...

Buffu said:
Any thoughts about Serge Lang's text ?
Thank you for the answer. Do you mean "Undergraduate Algebra" or just "Algebra"?
 
I don't have much experience with many algebra books, but excuse me for chiming in anyway. The algebra books I used as an undergraduate are Hungerford's Abstract Algebra: An Introduction and Artin's Algebra. I recall understanding and liking Hungerford's book more. Though this feeling is probably colored by the fact that the portions I studied in Artin were the more advanced stuff not in Hungerford's, like group representation theory.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
10K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K