Question regarding sylow subgroups

  • Thread starter Thread starter geor
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around proving that the intersection of a Sylow p-subgroup P of a group G with a normal subgroup N is itself a Sylow p-subgroup of N. The user struggles with applying the conjugacy part of Sylow's theorem effectively, noting that while P ∩ N is a p-subgroup of N, it must be shown that it has the same cardinality as another Sylow p-subgroup Q of N. They explore implications of N being normal and consider the second isomorphism theorem to relate the structures of P and N. Additionally, they mention a related exercise about showing that PN/N is a Sylow p-subgroup of G/N, indicating a possible simplification in the proof. Overall, the user seeks clarification and hints to advance their understanding of the problem.
geor
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Hello everybody,

I I have an exercise here that I'm really stuck with..

Let P be in Syl_p(G) and assume N is a normal subgroup of G. Use the conjugacy part of Sylow's theorem to prove that P intesect N is a Sylow p-subgroup of N.

The "conjugacy part" in this book ('Algebra' by Dummit, Foote) is about
p-subgroups of G being subgroups of a conjugate of a Sylow p-subgroup
in G.

I tried some different approaches but can't get nowhere..
Using the "conjugacy part of the thm" for P intersect N has no
use since already P intersect N is a subgroup of P itself, so
we have to use it for another subgroup.

I also considered Q a sylow p-subgroup of N. Eventually I would
like to show that Q and (P intersect N) have the same cardinality.
Well, (P intersect N) is a p-subgroup of N and Q is a sylow p-subgrp of N
so that from "the conjugacy part of Sylow's thm" we have that
(P intersect N) is a subgroup of a conjugate of Q in G, that is,
(P intersect N) <= gQg^-1, some g in G.
That seems to be something but can't go more far..


Finally, the fact that N is normal smells like 2nd iso theorem..
From this, we deduce that (P intersect N) is normal sbgrp of P
and N is a normal sbgrp of NP.. Also
P / (P intersect N) is isomorphic to NP / N.
So we can play with the cardinalities.
But can't think of anything else :(

Any ideas or hints highly appreciated!
Thanks in advance!

PS. I wasn't sure if I should post this in the 'homework' section. This is an exercise
given in a first year graduate course in Algebra and I think that it shouldn't be put
with "calculus and beyond" questions..


EDIT: Actually the exercise has another part: "Deduce that PN/N is a sylow p-sbgrp of G/N".
Well, there is a chance that we don't need the normality of N to show the first part of the question (the thing that I asked)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
im a little sleepy but it seems kind of obvious. take any p subgroup of N and enlarge it to a sylow subgroup of G which is conjugate to your sylow subgroup, so your p group is conjugate to a subgroup of your p group intersected with N, so that bthing is maximal, hence sylow. ?
 
Oh well..
'm sleepy too, maybe that's why I didn't understand... :(

Could you please use some letters?

Let's take an p-subgroup H<N.
When you say 'enlarge it' you mean 'see it as' right (forgive my english)?
So, H<K where K = g P g^-1.

So H is conjugate to a subgroup of H intersected with N?
I don't understand that..

Sorry for the lack of understanding, maybe it will be more clear
tomorrow when I wake up :)
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K