Question related two different ways to do solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter helloword365
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a mathematical problem involving the calculation of the sidelength of a cross-section, specifically expressed as 8 - 8x/3. The user questions the validity of this expression compared to their own method, which relies on similar triangle relationships. The two potential energy values in question are 470 kJ and 117 kJ. The user seeks clarification on the correctness of the integral presented in red font.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, specifically integration techniques.
  • Familiarity with geometric concepts, particularly similar triangles.
  • Knowledge of energy calculations in physics.
  • Experience with mathematical notation and expressions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review integration techniques for calculating areas under curves.
  • Study the properties of similar triangles and their applications in geometry.
  • Explore energy conservation principles in physics.
  • Investigate common errors in mathematical problem-solving and verification methods.
USEFUL FOR

Students in mathematics or physics, educators teaching calculus and geometry, and anyone involved in solving complex mathematical problems.

helloword365
Messages
7
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
An upside-down square pyramid with a height of 3 m and side lengths of 8m is filled to the brim with water. How much work is needed to lift all the water out of the container through the top. (ρ = 1000 kg/m3, g = 9.8 m/s2)
Relevant Equations
Work = Force * displacement
My work:
Screenshot 2025-04-12 203210.png


Answer Key (red font one) *may not be right.

My question is why is sidelength of cross section written as 8-8x/3, while my way of doing it doesn't involve that (involves suspicious similar triangle relationships)? Which answer (if any) is right here? 470 kj or 117 kj? Thank you!

Screenshot 2025-04-12 203210.png


Screenshot 2025-04-12 203309.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you try doing the integral in red?
 

Similar threads

Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K