Question using Hubble's Constant

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jimmy87
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on converting Hubble's constant from SI units of s-1 to kms-1 Mpc-1, specifically using the value 2.31 x 10-18 s-1. The conversion involves understanding the relationship H = v/d, where H is Hubble's constant, v is velocity, and d is distance. The correct conversion results in 71.4 kms-1 Mpc-1 by dividing by 1000 to convert meters to kilometers and multiplying by 3.09 x 1022 to convert meters to megaparsecs. The discussion also highlights a common misconception regarding unit conversion when using Hubble's constant in years-1, which leads to incorrect conclusions about the final units.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hubble's Law and its formula H = v/d
  • Familiarity with unit conversions, specifically between meters, kilometers, and megaparsecs
  • Basic knowledge of scientific notation and its application in calculations
  • Awareness of the significance of Hubble's constant in cosmology
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Hubble's constant in cosmology and its observational significance
  • Learn about the conversion factors between different astronomical distance units, particularly megaparsecs
  • Study the derivation and calculation methods for Hubble's constant from the age of the universe
  • Explore common pitfalls in unit conversions in physics and astronomy
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy students, astrophysicists, educators teaching cosmology, and anyone involved in calculations related to Hubble's constant and cosmic distances.

Jimmy87
Messages
692
Reaction score
19

Homework Statement


Converting Hubble's constant in SI units of s-1 into kms-1 Mpc-1 (kilometers per second per megaparsec)
Number given is 2.31 x 10^-18 s-1.

Homework Equations


H = v/d (where H is Hubble's constant, v = velocity and d = distance)

The Attempt at a Solution


I can see how you get the answer but it took me a while to see the reasoning for what to divide/multiply by. I reasoned that if you use H = v/d then 2.31 x 10^-18 s-1 can be re-written as 2.31 x 10^-18 ms-1 m-1 (meters per second per metre). I then treated the numerator and denominator separately. So to get from m/s to km per second you divide by 1000. Then to get from per metre to per megaparsec you multiply by the number of metres in a megaparsec. So overall you get 2.31 x 10^-18 x 3.09 x 10^22 / 1000 which gives 71.4 kms-1 Mpc-1. Using the same logic I don't understand something on the additional notes in the mark scheme for this question. I have uploaded the question and markscheme. They have shown an example of if you forget to convert hubble's constant into s-1 otherwise it will be in years-1. They then work this answer through the same way and give less marks for it however they say that the units are still kms-1 Mpc-1 at the end but that seems wrong to me. If you take hubble's constant in years-1 instead of seconds-1 and then multiply by the same number and divide by the same number surely its impossible to end up with the same final units? or am I missing something?
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
I think they just give half mark because the reasonning behind it is somewhat correct and the answer if off "only" because it confuses units - but you are right, that second answer is just wrong (unless 2×10^9=71:wink:).

Note that calculating the Hubble constant from the age of the universe is rather dubious, and that constant is actually observed, not derived.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jimmy87

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K