Questions about acceleration in SR

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Fredrik
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration Sr
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the world line of a rocket undergoing constant proper acceleration in special relativity (SR). The key equation provided is d = (c²√(1 + (at/c)²))/a, which describes the relationship between time (t) and distance (d) in an inertial frame. The properties of hyperbolas are emphasized, particularly how they relate to the Minkowski metric, with hyperbolas exhibiting characteristics similar to Euclidean circles. The conversation also touches on the concept of rapidity and its invariance across different inertial frames, concluding that proper acceleration remains consistent regardless of the observer's frame.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity concepts, particularly proper acceleration.
  • Familiarity with hyperbolic functions and their properties.
  • Knowledge of the Minkowski metric and its implications in spacetime geometry.
  • Basic grasp of Lorentz transformations and rapidity in relativistic physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the world line for constant proper acceleration using Rindler coordinates.
  • Explore the implications of the Minkowski metric on hyperbolic trajectories in spacetime.
  • Learn about the relationship between rapidity and velocity in special relativity.
  • Investigate the concept of proper acceleration and its measurement in different inertial frames.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those specializing in relativity, aerospace engineers, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of spacetime and acceleration in special relativity.

  • #31
DrGreg said:
So we can write

<br /> \Lambda_{\phi} = e^{Z\phi}<br />​

Indeed :smile:

Regards, Hans
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
  • #33
kev said:
That looks a LOT like the polar equation for a logarithimic spiral http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LogarithmicSpiral.html . Do you think there is any connection?
Note that Z is a matrix here...e^{Z\phi} ~=~ I~+~Z\phi ~+~ \frac{1}{2!}Z^2\phi^2~+~ \frac{1}{3!}Z^3\phi^3~+~ \frac{1}{4!}Z^4\phi^4~+~ \frac{1}{5!}Z^5\phi^5 ...

But higher powers of Z simply become either Z or Z^2

Z~ = Z^3 = Z^5 = ... = \left(\begin{array}{cccc}<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 1 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 1 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\<br /> \end{array}\right)

Z^2 = Z^4 = Z^6 = ... = \left(\begin{array}{cccc}<br /> 1 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 1 \\<br /> \end{array}\right)

and therefor:

e^{Z\phi} ~=~ I ~+~ \sinh(\phi)\left(\begin{array}{cccc}<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 1 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 1 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\<br /> \end{array}\right) ~+~ (\cosh(\phi)-1)\left(\begin{array}{cccc}<br /> 1 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 1 \\<br /> \end{array}\right) ~=~ \left(\begin{array}{cccc}<br /> \cosh\phi &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; \sinh\phi \\<br /> 0 &amp; 1 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 1 &amp; 0 \\<br /> \sinh\phi &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; \cosh\phi \\<br /> \end{array}\right)
Regards, Hans
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 144 ·
5
Replies
144
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K