The discussion centers on the challenges of submitting papers for peer review in physics, particularly when lacking a mathematical foundation. Participants emphasize that intuitive understanding of General Relativity (GR) without mathematical rigor is insufficient for serious academic work. They reference The Crackpot Index to illustrate the importance of credentials and mathematical knowledge in gaining acceptance within the scientific community. The consensus is that a comprehensive understanding of physics, including cosmology and quantum field theory, is essential before attempting to publish research.
PREREQUISITESStudents and researchers in physics, aspiring authors of scientific papers, and anyone interested in understanding the peer review process in theoretical physics.
Good luck!Enos said:
That does indeed seem unfair. The "maintenance" guy servicing the superconducting magnets or whatever is probably every bit as educated as the guys actually writing the paper. He or she must be left with a rather bad taste in his/her mouth.berkeman said:
