Papers submitted for peer review without a solid mathematical foundation are unlikely to be accepted, as a deep understanding of general relativity (GR) requires rigorous mathematical knowledge. Intuitive ideas about GR are often incomplete and can lead to misconceptions, as even established physicists like Einstein revised their theories over time. Serious journals typically do not consider work from those without formal qualifications in physics, as the field has a vast body of established theory that requires years of study to grasp. To engage with advanced topics like black holes or quantum gravity, one must first acquire a comprehensive understanding of foundational physics and mathematics. Ultimately, peer review is a process that expects authors to demonstrate significant expertise and knowledge in their subject area.
