Questions about the Hershey-Chase experiment

  • Thread starter Thread starter moe darklight
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Hershey-Chase experiment successfully demonstrated that DNA is the genetic material by using radioactive isotopes to label E. coli viruses. Specifically, sulfur-35 was used to tag proteins, while phosphorus-32 was used to tag DNA. The bacteria incorporated these isotopes from their culture medium, allowing researchers to track which component was responsible for carrying genetic information. This method effectively avoided damaging the viruses, as the isotopes have a relatively long half-life and do not significantly hinder bacterial function during the experiment.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic molecular biology concepts, including DNA and protein structure.
  • Familiarity with isotopes and their application in biological experiments.
  • Knowledge of bacterial culture techniques and growth conditions.
  • Awareness of the principles of radioactive decay and half-life.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the methodology of the Hershey-Chase experiment in detail.
  • Learn about the use of radioactive isotopes in molecular biology, focusing on sulfur-35 and phosphorus-32.
  • Explore bacterial culture techniques and how they are used in genetic experiments.
  • Investigate the implications of the Hershey-Chase experiment on the field of genetics and molecular biology.
USEFUL FOR

Students of biology, educators teaching molecular genetics, and researchers interested in the historical experiments that shaped our understanding of DNA as genetic material.

moe darklight
Messages
409
Reaction score
0
This Biology textbook I'm reading describes how DNA was finally identified as the material that contains the information of a life-form* or virus. How they did this by marking two batches of E. coli viruses with either a radioactive isotope of sulfur (35)—to tag protein—or a radioactive isotope of phosphorus (32)—to tag DNA—. Then they would identify if the carrier of information is the DNAS or the protein (whichever was present in the infected cells and their offspring).

The book doesn't go on a lot of detail on the actual process though. How is a cell or virus "marked" with these isotopes? how do you insert radioactive phosphorus atoms into a DNA sequence without destroying or corrupting the virus? ... and wouldn't the unstable atoms destroy such a small structure (the virus and its genetic code)?* was this hyphen used correctly? I wonder... :biggrin:
 
Biology news on Phys.org
moe darklight said:
The book doesn't go on a lot of detail on the actual process though. How is a cell or virus "marked" with these isotopes? how do you insert radioactive phosphorus atoms into a DNA sequence without destroying or corrupting the virus? ... and wouldn't the unstable atoms destroy such a small structure (the virus and its genetic code)?

Ah, I have a bit of memory of having those types of questions back in my intro biology courses as well...would be nice for textbooks to explain these things rather than making you think they "magically" inserted the labels onto DNA.

The way this is done, in a nutshell, is to let the bacteria do the work themselves. All you need to do is provide the radioactive precursors in the culture medium they're being grown in, and they use it like any other nutrient. Then you have a bunch of bacteria with both protein and DNA labeled, you wash away all the remaining radioactive "nutrients" you provided, and then watch what the bacteria do on their own.

The isotopes chosen have a relatively long half life (in terms of bacterial growth rates anyway), and don't do a lot of harm in the time scale that the experiments are performed. It's possible that some cell functions are a bit hindered by incorporation of these isotopes, but for the purpose of these experiments, it's not relevant as long as it isn't lethal.
 
that's really clever. cool thanks :biggrin:
 
As child, before I got my first X-ray, I used to fantasize that I might have a mirror image anatomy - my heart on the right, my appendix on the right. Why not? (Caveat: I'm not talking about sci-fi molecular-level mirroring. We're not talking starvation because I couldn't process certain proteins, etc.) I'm simpy tlakng about, when a normal zygote divides, it technically has two options which way to form. Oen would expcet a 50:50 split. But we all have our heart on the left and our...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K