Questions dealing with Angular momentum (but maybe kinetic engery)

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on a physics problem involving a figure skater rotating with a sphere. The net force on the sphere includes gravity and a normal force due to the skater's grip, indicating that multiple forces are at play. When the sphere is released, it will fall like any typical object, unaffected by the skater's rotation. The final kinetic energy provided is only translational, as the centripetal force ceases upon release, simplifying the calculations. The moment of inertia for the sphere can be treated as a point mass since its radius is not specified, allowing for straightforward application of the relevant formulas.
Prodan
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I recently had a question on a test that just boggled my mind. I could not find the answer and unfortunatley could not consult a T.A. I have a vague memory of the question. It is a figure skater rotating at angular velocity w = 2 rad/s (not sure if that number is correct). The figure skater is holding a sphere mass 150grams(.15kg) which is located .6 meters from the axis of rotation. The sphere is 1.6m from the ground.
a) What is the net force acting on the small sphere? (I said gravity but was not sure)
b) How long will it take the ball to hit the ground if released?
c) Calculate the Initial Kinetic Energy given the final Kinetic engery is 12000 J. (I think this was the phrasing of last question)

At first I thought of using the
mgh + 1/2I(Inertia)w(Angular vel)^2 = 1/2mv^2(1+ I(Intertia of Centre of Mass) / MR^2)

We are not given intertia though? or did i remember this incorrectly perhaps? Would it make more sense to have intertia?

I am truley stumped, any help would be awesome.

Kevin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a)Well it's rotating. If the only force acting on it was gravity, it wouldn't be rotating. In fact, there's also a normal force on it from her hands since she hasn't dropped it yet, so it's just the centripetal force

b)The rotational motion has no effect on it falling, it's just your typical falling object problem

c)Remember the final kinetic energy is only translational, once she let's go the centripetal force goes away and it's only traveling linearly(EDIT: In the sense that it's not going to be KEtotal=1/2mv^2+1/2Iw^2, just 1/2mv^2, and it'll travel in a parabolic arc like you always see with projectile motion)

Also the moment of inertia of a point mass is just mr^2, where r is its distance from the rotational axis. You should assume it's a point mass, a solid sphere has a different moment of inertia but you're not given a radius of the sphere, so I don't think you assume that
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
811
Replies
18
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
335
Views
15K
Replies
9
Views
2K