Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Quick tetrad/vierbein question

  1. Nov 26, 2011 #1
    In working with these vierbein fields I've come across these terms such as [itex]e^{aμ}[/itex][itex]e^{μ}_{a}[/itex] where the e's are vierbein fields. The thing is I have no idea what this represents because of the repeated μ's.You can rewrite this with the local lorentz metric to raise and lower the a's and b's but you're still left with identical greek indices. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 26, 2011 #2

    George Jones

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Could you give a reference to where you see this?
     
  4. Nov 26, 2011 #3

    Matterwave

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I think Wald will use, for example, the notation [itex](e_\mu)^a(e_\mu)_a[/itex] I wasn't able to figure that out too well either.

    I think the latin index should just tell you that it's a vector or a one form, and the Greek index should tell you which basis vector he's talking about.
     
  5. Nov 26, 2011 #4
    I was decomposing the curvature tensor in terms of vierbeins, and when I contracted it with the vierbein I ended up with a term like the one mentioned. I can't get rid of it.
     
  6. Nov 26, 2011 #5

    Bill_K

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    If it arose legitimately, the value is eμa eμa = δμμ = 4.
     
  7. Nov 26, 2011 #6

    dextercioby

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    It must have been a typo or something, both Lorentz and world indices must be used repeatedly, only if summed over and summation should be <covariant vs contravariant>, so that

    [tex] e^{\mu}_{~a} e^{\mu a} [/tex]

    is wrong, while


    [tex] e^{\mu}_{~a} e_{\mu}^{~a} [/tex]

    is correct.
     
  8. Nov 28, 2011 #7
    Not to disagree with you, but I've come at this problem a few different ways now and I always get stuck on the same term. It's not a typo, it somehow represents the inner product of a vierbein field with itself.
     
  9. Nov 29, 2011 #8

    dextercioby

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    The 'inner product' is still expressible in terms of the metric, therefore covariant, so that my statement from point 6 applies.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Quick tetrad/vierbein question
  1. Tetrad calculus (Replies: 3)

  2. Question about Tetrad (Replies: 7)

Loading...