The polynomial [itex]x^2-x+1[/itex] is irreducible over [itex]\mathbb{R}[/itex] since if the polynomial was reducible it would have a linear factor in [itex]\mathbb{R}[x][/itex] and hence a zero in [itex]\mathbb{R}[/itex]. But the polynomial has no zeroes hence factorization is impossible.
Because of this fact, the quotient ring [itex]\mathbb{R}[x]/(x^2-x+1)[/itex] is a field.
I now look for isomorphisms that take elements in the quotient ring to elements of the complex numbers.
[tex]\phi : \mathbb{R}[x]/(x^2-x+1) \rightarrow \mathbb{C}[/tex]
An element in the quotient ring will be of the form [itex](a+bx)[/itex], where [itex]x[/itex] is a solution to [itex]x^2-x+1=0[/itex]. And an element of the complex numbers will be of the form [itex](a+b\lambda)[/itex] where [itex]\lambda[/itex] is a solution to [itex]\lambda^2-\lambda+1=0[/itex].
Now [itex]\phi[/itex] is an isomorphism if it is a homomorphism with respect to addition and multiplication. That is
[tex]\phi(a+b) = \phi(a') + \phi(b')[/tex]
[tex]\phi(ab) = \phi(a')\phi(b')[/tex]
Where [itex]a,b[/itex] are elements of the quotient ring and [itex]a',b'[/itex] are elements of the complex numbers.
The kernel of this map is that element of the quotient ring which maps to [itex]0 \in \mathbb{C}[/itex]. That is, [itex]\ker{\phi} = x[/itex] where [itex]x[/itex] is the solution to [itex]x^2-x+1=0[/itex].
Im not sure if all this so far is necessary to show an isomorphism exists, but I wrote this just to make sure my reasoning is correct. It probably isn't, but someone can point that one out.
Now it suffices to show that [itex]\phi(ab) = \phi(a')\phi(b')[/itex].
[tex]\phi(ab) = \phi((a+bx)(c+dx))[/tex]
[tex]= \phi(ac + (bc+ad)x + bdx^2)[/tex]
[tex]= \phi(ac + (bc+ad)x + bd(x-1))[/tex]
[tex]= \phi(ac + (bc+ad)x + bdx - bd)[/tex]
[tex]= \phi(ac + (bc+ad-bd)x + bd)[/tex]
And
[tex]\phi(a')\phi(b') = \phi(a'+b'\lambda)\phi(c'+d'\lambda)[/tex]
[tex]= \phi(a'c' + (b'c' + a'd')\lambda + b'd'\lambda^2)[/tex]
[tex]= \phi(a'c' + (b'c' + a'd')\lambda + b'd'(\lambda -1))[/tex]
[tex]= \phi(a'c' + (b'c' + a'd' - b'd')\lambda + b'd')[/tex]
And so [itex]\phi(ab) = \phi(a')\phi(b')[/itex]
Also note that if we divide [itex]bdx^2 + (bc+ad)x + ac[/itex] by [itex]x^2-x+1[/itex] using long division we obtain
[tex]ac + (bc+ad-bd)x + bd = \phi^{-1}\phi(ab)[/tex]
Not sure what all this means though.